User talk:Fanx

NZ general election 1975

Re the NZ general election articles; the Waitakere electorate was replaced by Henderson (with Martyn Finlay as MP) for 1969, 1972 & 1975 (see Norton pages 375 & 376). Hence I have removed the references to Waitakere in the article on the 1975 general election. Hugo999 (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 05:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tamaki by-election 1992

Hi. I have been conducting research on OECD politics. As part of my research, I obtained elections data for the Tamaki by-election in 1992 directly from the NZ Electoral Commission. I have added these results to your article. I thought you may have been interested, so I figured I'd drop you a note on your talk page. Please feel free to clean up my templating work, and if you do manage to find the given names of the candidates for which I had only family names, that'd be great. Cheers. 2607:F010:2E9:1:9CD0:A41F:2317:3F4C (talk) 16:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome; thank you. Good work! Schwede 66 18:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fanx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fanx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NZ parlbox minor

Template:NZ parlbox minor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MMP election box candidate with party link

Template:MMP election box candidate with party link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fanx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to discussion

I kindly invited you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A thank you

Hello Fanx, my name is Rebestalic

Thank you for thank you-ing my edit! I take it upon myself to get that update done like it's a race haha

People like you remind me that there are rewards to editing other than self-pride

Oh my, you look very decorated... quite impressive

Very impressive

I should stop wasting your time now, I'm certain you have better things to do Rebestalic^{[dubious—discuss]} 04:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand COVID-19 cases

Hello Fanx, Rebestalic here again

As you can see in the New Zealand field in the Coronavirus template, New Zealand recoveries have now exceeded confirmed cases. What should we do?

That is strange ... but it is a consequence of NZ's counting confirmed and probable cases, without any clear definition of whether any probables become confirmed or are excluded as false positives. The only solution I can think of is expanding the footnote for the NZ part of the template to explain this apparent discrepancy. I've not been active on the Covid-19 pages lately ... with an acquaintance of a family member succumbing in the UK, and having friends working in the Belgian and Spanish health services it's become just a bit too depressing. Fanx (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kia kaha, my friend. My thoughts are with you. Schwede 66 19:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion

One or more of your templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welsh Assembly election

Template:Welsh Assembly election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NZ election box coalition candidate

Template:NZ election box coalition candidate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MMP election box majority

Template:MMP election box majority has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MMP election box

Template:MMP election box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Internet Party and MANA Movement/meta/gradient

Template:Internet Party and MANA Movement/meta/gradient has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Political party extended meta

Template:Political party extended meta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Party name with color box

Template:Party name with color box has been nominated for merging with Template:Party index link. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Political party list/meta/shading

Template:Political party list/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Electorates of New Zealand, 2002–2008

Template:Electorates of New Zealand, 2002–2008 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party/meta/shading

Template:Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Focus NZ/meta/shading

Template:Focus NZ/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Future New Zealand (Dunne)/meta/shading

Template:Future New Zealand (Dunne)/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hapu Party/meta/shading

Template:Hapu Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Heartland New Zealand Party/meta/shading

Template:Heartland New Zealand Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Internet Party (New Zealand)/meta/shading

Template:Internet Party (New Zealand)/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Internet Party and Mana Movement/meta/shading

Template:Internet Party and Mana Movement/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mana Wahine Te Ira Tangata/meta/shading

Template:Mana Wahine Te Ira Tangata/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mauri Pacific/meta/shading

Template:Mauri Pacific/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Citizen Party/meta/shading

Template:New Citizen Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Conservative Party (New Zealand)/meta/shading

Template:New Conservative Party (New Zealand)/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Conservative Party of New Zealand/meta/shading

Template:New Conservative Party of New Zealand/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Conservative Party/meta/shading

Template:New Zealand Conservative Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Democratic Party for Social Credit/meta/shading

Template:New Zealand Democratic Party for Social Credit/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Pacific Party/meta/shading

Template:New Zealand Pacific Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Party/meta/shading

Template:New Zealand Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Public Party/meta/shading

Template:New Zealand Public Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Sovereignty Party/meta/shading

Template:New Zealand Sovereignty Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand TEA Party/meta/shading

Template:New Zealand TEA Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:ONE Party/meta/shading

Template:ONE Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Opposition (parliamentary)/meta/shading

Template:Opposition (parliamentary)/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Oytcho-Visha/meta/shading

Template:Oytcho-Visha/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pirate Party of New Zealand/meta/shading

Template:Pirate Party of New Zealand/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shore Voice/meta/shading

Template:Shore Voice/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Putting People First (Auckland political ticket)/meta/shading

Template:Putting People First (Auckland political ticket)/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sustainable New Zealand Party/meta/shading

Template:Sustainable New Zealand Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Te Tawharau/meta/shading

Template:Te Tawharau/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Kiwi Party/meta/shading

Template:The Kiwi Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vision NZ/meta/shading

Template:Vision NZ/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Zealand local authority political templates

A tag has been placed on Category:New Zealand local authority political templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Meta color

Template:Meta color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi Fanx! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of American Truck Simulator several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:American Truck Simulator, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. I've semi-protected both articles due to the disruption from IPs and new accounts. That won't stop you though, so please don't force me to have to consider a partial block here. The talk page is where you need to be discussing the issue.. -- ferret (talk) 13:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stay clear of edit warring, Fanx. Getting blocked is just not worth it. Schwede 66 17:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to disagree on that point Schwede. Sometimes taking a stand is 'worth it' - in spite of the cost to oneself. It used to be that you and I would fight ignorant outside interference in a project we'd both worked on. When we stopped being able to stand up against The Borg I had to walk away. I don't ever want to find myself having to surrender to the supposedly well-meaning bullies again. 23:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Fanx (talk) 23:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is demonstrably false, and hypocritical. We have one editor that has made three reverts so I'd suggest you take up with them, and discuss their refusal to engage in consensus building. FYI - I do not have a "preferred version" of the article - I'm just opposed to that 'refusal to engage in consensus' that is just dogmatic & browbeating. 19:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Fanx (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I did not restore until after two other editors had their restorations reverted by the article's singular edit-warrior. Try reading the article's history - I'm not the problem here. 20:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Fanx (talk) 20:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You restored content against guidelines, without a stated reason beyond an attack on the editor who was removing it. The other two editors restored it without any reason whatsoever. While it's not great that Soetermans continued to revert, you then reverted another editor (Woodroar, again with attacks on their character), and only stopped when a third (Melodia) reverted you again. My goal here is to stop the mainspace edit war, without resorting to ECP/Full protection or a partial block for anyone. If you don't have a 'preferred version', then you can certainly wait for any discussions to play out. -- ferret (talk) 20:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are discussions supposed to play out when I would be talking to no-one but myself? If I've found the other editor does not engage in consensus building then to pursue such would be futile and farcical. Your suggestion doesn't make a lot of sense. Suggesting that disingenuous claims about sources are in fact disingenuous is not an attack on character - it's a simple statement of fact. I do agree that the page needs work (my not having a "preferred version" solely relates to the versions in discussion - a better article would be my preference), but the shredding of it in a contrived rage manner is not a productive way forward. 23:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Fanx (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I won't trouble you further, but I see at least 2 other editors engaged on the talk page, and one more that has supported the edit without commenting. -- ferret (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. 06:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Fanx (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]