Jump to content

User talk:Hitcher vs. Candyman/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films in the public domain in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Downsizing (film)

[edit]

The article Downsizing (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, showed at one film festival, did not receive any significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 10:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Nice memes

Jsmith7342 (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dabney Coleman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page On Golden Pond (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain films/NY Times database

[edit]

I noticed you pulling films cited to the New York Times Movie database at List of films in the public domain in the United States. The database has been offline since the start of the month and the links now redirect to the reviews section. You can read more about the issue at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#NYT_film_database_seems_to_be_gone. Anyway, per WP:DEADREF it might be better to just tag those entries since the source may be retrievable through the Wayback Machine. For example, the cite for This Is the Army can be retrieved at http://web.archive.org/web/20080423020617/http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/49566/This-Is-the-Army/overview. Betty Logan (talk) 01:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Betty Logan:: Not all of them redirect to the reviews section. I have come across six films on that list that redirect to dead links. These six films are mentioned at the talk page. Feel free to discuss it there. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 02:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florence Tullis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dwarf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delbert Mann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Air Corps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Morey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civic Theater. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]

I assessed your article Karl Francis Hettinger on 2016/06/06. I assigned it a "Start". I have my doubts that it qualifies as "significant", but I don't want to pursue that. If you want a higher rating, you should add material to demonstrate significance. You can delete this message as soon as you read it. --Vicedomino (talk) 04:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grantham & Rose has been accepted

[edit]
Grantham & Rose, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Omni Flames (talk) 22:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Omni Flames:: Thank you for accepting my draft. By the way, I was wondering when if possible you can review this other draft I submitted. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 00:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cinecom Pictures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1918 (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Omni Flames was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Omni Flames (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Hitcher vs. Candyman, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Omni Flames (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Omni Flames:: On the contrary, I'm glad it was declined. It's my fault for being impatient. Thank you very much. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UGH!

[edit]

May I edit the Shared universe page?

Should I remove Ben 10: Alien Force/Ben 10: Ultimate Alien, Transformers: Animated, Star Wars: Clone Wars from the Shared universe#Time Warner section and the edit summary is: "No licensed characters allowed in the universe" and edit it to simply say:

If I were you, I'd ask someone at Wikipedia:Help desk. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Who Killed Nelson Nutmeg? has been accepted

[edit]
Who Killed Nelson Nutmeg?, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokyogirl79: Thank you very much. :-) Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Appearing for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Appearing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Appearing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Hitcher vs. Candyman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Northern Borders has been accepted

[edit]
Northern Borders, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 07:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain: Thank you very much. :-) Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have requested that a Histmerge of Maximum Ride (2016 film) to Maximum Ride (film) be performed. Your version of this article should always have been edited into Maximum Ride (film) (where the bulk of edits to the article on this topic has always existed), not created as a new separate Maximum Ride (2016 film) article (this action is akin to what is known as a Cut-and-paste move). Maximum Ride (2016 film) should simply be a redirect to Maximum Ride (film) as the latter is the correct title for this topic. Thanks. --IJBall (contribstalk) 08:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@IJBall:: Thanks for the tip. Sorry for the late response. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]