User talk:JMDP
ATP World Tour/WTA Tour qualifying draws
[edit]Your vote will be very important. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 ASB Classic – Singles Qualifying PL Alvarez Talk, 20:22, 4 Janury 2011 (UTC)
Speedy Work
[edit]Nice work on editing in the Hopman Cup results across other relevant articles. You beat me to a few of them, and I had them open in another tab waiting for the result! Keep up work like that and you'll get quite a few barnstars over time. SellyminimeTalk 10:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
If someone announces his retirement, it's official isn't it? We don't have the privilege to overrule it. If he choses to come back for a tournament (because he received a wildcard), it's his decision. I personally doubt he will play another one (neither likely to receive another WC) thus it will be a one-match comeback, which can also be inlcuded at the bottom of the 2011 ATP World Tour. Let me repeat myself : self-announcement equals official. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 18:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Since you haven't responded for a week I will put the information back. Try to consider two fictional situation compared to this one:
- Carlos Moya receives a wild card in 2011 to a tournament in his home town and he'll accept for popularity reasons. Then you will erase his retirement section and state that he officially retired in 2011 despite his retirement ceremony where he said so?
- Imagine Hrbatý won't play any more 2011 (that's not so fictional though). Than - according to your logic - it must be written at the the bottom of 2011 ATP Tour that he officially retired in February after one match of playing? Decided to retire in the beginning of the season? I don't think that is correct.
Hope this helps to change your mind. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 08:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey there JMDP, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:JMDP/Sandbox.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
- If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited 1990 Eurocard Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eurocard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 1990 ABN World Tennis Tournament – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jeremy Bates
- 1990 Australian Open – Men's Doubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jeremy Bates
- 1990 Stella Artois Indoor – Doubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jeremy Bates
- 1990 Stella Artois Indoor – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jeremy Bates
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I really like the stuff that you recently established here. Keep up the good work. 
Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 12:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Putting "Did not advance"
[edit]Hi. I have some concerns. I noticed that you reverted the format I did on tennis, which is putting "did not advance" using "n/a" template. The problem is that it becomes easier to confuse. Can you please put simple "did not advance" only without using background color, or {{n/a}} template for those who are eliminated in the rounds? Only {{n/a}} template can be used only for "n/a" and "bye", not for "did not advance" or vice versa. Always follow the manual on WikiProject Olympics: WP:OLYMOSNAT. Thank you and I hope you understand. Bear my patience and hardwork regarding on editing and updating the results. (T.C) 09:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Template:Infobox tennis tournament has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox ITF Women's Circuit Tournament. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Konstantin Kravchuk for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Konstantin Kravchuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konstantin Kravchuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 08:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, JMDP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, JMDP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, JMDP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
