User talk:Jan.Smolik

Welcome!

Hello, Jan.Smolik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Johntex\^talk 19:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amín-i-Iláhí

Do you have a suggestion for cleaning up that page? I think the context is fine and there are enough lnks to cover whatever is not understood. People will only find this page after rumaging through a bunch of other similar pages. Cuñado - Talk 18:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I understand why you might get confused. I'm making a lot of similar pages and I'll keep the same format for the intro. Cuñado

- Talk 20:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of Czechoslovakia history articles

I have got a concern about pages related to the history of Czechoslovakia. Although they are very well written and are very long, most of the text was created by one user, with not much input. I feel they might be a bit POV espesicaly parts about minorities (there was some dispute on the Czech wikipedia). I do not know, how to tag those articles. I do not see POV on the first sight so I do not want dispute them. But I would like to attract users with different oppinoins (Germans, Hungarians, and people from "neutral" states) to read it and say, "hay this might be POV" or "hey, thats good". --Jan Smolik 12:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"POV in both ways"

I saw your comment on Sabeel article and I wanted to make sure that you have read the Wikipedia:NPOV and Wikipedia:POV articles. You probably know that POVs are allowed in wikipedia as long as they are attributed to someone. I just wanted to make sure since you are a relatively new user. PS You made good edits on the Sabeel article. MPS 16:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CIS

The Bush analogy has me puzzled. I'm not a believer in Bush family conspiracy theories, although I've never voted for any of them. There's nothing wrong with an organization based in Texas observing an election in Florida (my home state, btw) featuring a member of the Bush family on the ballot, if it has a good reputation... Regarding the CIS, there's little need to get bogged down in the details surrounding the organization in articles related the Belarus election. This is a wiki. If readers are unfamiliar with the CIS, they can click on the hyperlink and read the article on the Commonwealth of Independent States. 172 | Talk 17:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will always more trust to the neutral observers rather than home observers. I think that the issue has more to do with institutions than locale. Technically Belarus is a member of both the OSCE and CIS. The difference, according to officials with the OSCE's monitoring unit, is that the OSCE's methodology is more rigorous than the CIS's. I think that they are clearly correct. (BTW, a good article was published by Radio Free Europe on the topic. [1]) The nationality of the observers does not matter per se if the organization has the resources needed to be effective, if it's transparent, and if it's professional. If the CIS were a more effective inter-governmental organization, in theory it could one day play a more effective role in monitoring elections in member states... Regarding the articles in question, I don't think we need to go in detail on the debate over the varying standards of the respective monitoring units of the two organizations. That topic is more complex than one would expect at first glance, and thus best covered in the articles that one can access by clicking the hyperlinks to the related articles. 172 | Talk 19:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QBFL

Not sure if your the right person to contact but the QBFL articles created by myself have been an item of much controversy recently in our community. Wondering how to delete it?

Wikics template

Hi Jan! Recently, I created a new template to indicate English Wikipedia user who also contribute to the Czech Wikipedia.

Template:User wikics

Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you like it (and if you actually contribute). Happy Easter. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 17:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dwarf planet/Naming#A New Proposal

I notice that in the current vote at Talk:Dwarf planet/Naming#A New Proposal, you have voted as I did - to "just let this be for 6 months or so, and see how things pan out.". I'm quite suprised to see that a consensus around Option 3 "Dwarf planets should have their title as Name (dwarf planet) or just Name depending on how well known they are compared to other things with the same name. Should this option be endorsed the use of (dwarf planet) should be decided on individual pages." actually appears to be forming; however some people are taking the votes to delay considering this as ammunition that there is no consensus. As such, I've switched my vote to Option 3, to help support a consensus, and end this debate. I'm not going to ask you do the same; but I thought you'd like to be aware of what is happening. Nfitz 02:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Democracy

There were actually two vandalisms in a row there...I reverted back to the last time I edited the page. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 14:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry I will try to be more carefull. --Jan Smolik 14:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I don't always catch things like that either. The other one was a harmless test; I sent them a test1 warning. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 14:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ja???? and zh????

Sorry thought it was untidy as it shows ???? in In other languages box, why does it not say Chinese or Japanese? Palmiped 12:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

printing in EA

Your contribution was very useful, so please do some more work on this and related pages: it is very much needed DGG 03:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Jan.Smolik! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 20:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have cookies enabled in Internet Explorer? That can cause problems logging in. Prodego ^talk 22:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, could you please detail exactly what you do when you try to log in (as in every button you press)? From clicking the exe, what happens? Sorry about the inconvenience in this, it will help rule out some problems. Thanks, Prodego ^talk 23:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well you are on the userlist, and you do have cookies enabled... Hmm, try disabling any firewall or anti-virus programs. Do you use Internet Explorer for your regular Wikipedia use? And is it IE7? Prodego ^talk 23:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will let you know if I find anything that can help, Prodego ^talk 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted our discussion on User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Discuss in case somebody had simmilar problem or any idea. I have tried to set accepting all cookies and disabled antivirus. Nothing. I will try second computer where firewall runs (I only can disable it there) but it needs my brother not being home :). Anyway, thanks for help, it is appreciated. --Jan.Smolik 15:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Try It now. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Debatepedia.com - query on your minimum wage contributions

I noticed your contributions on the "minimum wage article". A number of us have been working on a related article on Debatepedia.com - Minimum Wage in the United States Debate. Just thought you might be interested. Loudsirens 21:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia subject-specific style guidelines

I added a "sortkey" parameter to {{style-guideline}}, so these articles don't all end end up under "M" (for "Manual of style") in the category. Just wanted to let you know. Circeus 03:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

welcome to

the great printing debates of Fall 06. (or, more likely 06/07) Glad to have another interested voice. I see you move around a good deal, but if you want to spend some time at this group of linked pages, you will find some of the most stubborn people I've seen on WP. which is saying a lot. My own stuff there of course, of course, is soundly based and fairly worded every time. (smile) DGG 06:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Czech Republic

We are estabilishing WikiProject Czech Republic, maybe you would like to participate, please see [2] and vote for support. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 10:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Alphabet

Hi, I just read a comment you made a while back on a talk page, where you mentioned that;

In Czech we usually consider letters žščřďťňě and also "ch" (pronounced like Spanish x in Mexico) while "long" letters áéíóúůíý to be only letters with diacritics. Thus Czech alphabet has 36 letters.

I notice this information doesn't seem to be mentioned in the article on the Czech alphabet and wondered if you thought it should be, and if so whether you had any references for it.Number36 (talk) 00:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! A request for your input

Per wp:CANVASSING, this is a neutrally worded notice being sent, without any type of "selection" bias, to everyone that edited fairly recently the MOS page about how to term the Latter Day Saints denominations on Wikipedia in the belief that your various and collective expertise or expertises, if that's a plural, can help us improve its wording, if possible. a bit. The most pertinent section is here. And the issue is to what degree the terms "Mormon church" and "LDS church" relate to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in specific, and to what kind of sourcing should be used to document this. Thanks, if you find time and the interest to look into the matter and offer your opinion or commentary.--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 23:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jan.Smolik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]