User talk:Jannizzero1
Jannizzero1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Jannizzero1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC) |
Hello
[edit]Did you know that if you go to Wikipedia:Refill here, it can automatically fix bare urls. I just thought you should know. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem to work for me... --Jannizzero1 (talk) 21:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Good work at Augusto Liverani. - Hatchens (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you. --Jannizzero1 (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Husky order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlo Rossi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Alfonso Cigala Fulgosi
[edit]Hello, Jannizzero1,
Thank you for creating Alfonso Cigala Fulgosi.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Very interesting biography, thank you
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 20:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Verona trial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
[edit]Hi Jannizzero1, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Seddon talk 23:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Jannizzero1 (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Warning
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Reported
[edit]See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 12:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Article creations by globally locked account
[edit]The following 200-odd articles (apparently mostly about Italian military men) were created by Jannizzero1:
I'll link this discussion from WT:MIL so they can decide what, if anything to do about them. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Also, these biographies of politicians, journalists, authors, etc. from various countries by one of their socks:
Mathglot (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
And these, by another sock; mostly Italian military men:
Mathglot (talk) 21:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
And these two articles by blocked sock RegiaMarina (talk · contribs): Italian destroyer Nembo (1927), Italian destroyer Alvise da Mosto. Mathglot (talk) 21:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- These two seem fine to me. Both Milhist C-class and no obvious red flags. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:31, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
And these four by blocked sock ITW1112 (talk · contribs):
- Battle of Ain Zara
- Battle of Misrata (1912)
- Battle of Tripoli (1911)
- Italian destroyer Ugolino Vivaldi
That's it for now. Mathglot (talk) 21:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- These four seem fine to me. All Milhist C- or Start-class and no obvious red flags. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)