User talk:Jay2518

Welcome!

Hello, Jay2518, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Alltynex, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pontificalibus (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alltynex

The article Alltynex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable software

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alltynex 2nd

The article Alltynex 2nd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable software

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RefleX

The article RefleX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable software

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siter Skain

A tag has been placed on Siter Skain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kamui (Siter Skain)

The article Kamui (Siter Skain) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable software

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 23:20, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 23:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page RefleX has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6ElFZqI_2Q (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siter Skain

A tag has been placed on Siter Skain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. fetchcomms☛ 23:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Siter Skain, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Pontificalibus (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User subspace pages

Hi, I was just wondering what exactly you are doing with User:Jay2518/ZIZORK and associated pages. It seems you are creating some sort of game, Wikipedia really isn't about game (take a look at what Wikipedia is not), so that isn't something that would fit in here. However, I'm sure there are other sites out there that may be more suited to your plan. Prodego ^talk 18:23, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jay2518/ZIZORK

User:Jay2518/ZIZORK, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jay2518/ZIZORK and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jay2518/ZIZORK during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Q ^{T C} 18:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the nominated page and all associated pages per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jay2518/ZIZORK. There are a number of websites where you could host this type of content (such as your own wiki - see Wikipedia:Alternative outlets#Directory of alternatives), but Wikipedia is not one of them.

If you would like to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, I urge you to read Wikipedia:Introduction, which can be a useful resource to new editors who are unfamiliar with what Wikipedia is and how it functions. You can also contact me directly if you have any questions. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of animal names. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joja lozzo 01:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at McDonald's, you will be blocked from editing. Joja lozzo 00:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to List of animals by number of neurons. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Joja lozzo 00:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked 2 days for vandalism and sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 03:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Clarkcj12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to The Transformers (TV series), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clarkcj12 (talk) 03:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 67.170.169.30 (talk) 05:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ratchet and Clank & Jak and Daxter

This message is in regards to the above mentioned articles. Deadlocked and The Lost Frontier were both deemed to be included in the main series in the Talk Page for their respective articles after a consensus was reached among editors. This decision was influenced by several factors. One is the lack of noteworthy sources that refer to them as spin offs, while there are plenty of reviews and other articles that cite them as being part of the main series. Another argument made is that the games aren't canon for one reason or another, but this isn't a valid reason and is not allowed on Wikipedia, plus a game being canon or not isn't the determining factor in deciding if it is a spin off. If you wish to reopen the discussion on either of the articles Talk Page feel free. However, I doubt much has changed in the way of sources that state otherwise. Thanks. - Jak Fisher (Talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to DreamWorks Animation, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Carniolus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Also User:86.133.108.18 and User:85.210.187.75. You need to stop this now. DBaK (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Month for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

According to the webpage of Jay (Jay2518), "Hi my name is Jay (Jay2518) and you know I love Microsoft Studios and Sega better than Sony Computer Entertainment, and also I love Sega and Microsoft Studios a whole lot better than Nintendo. I also love parachuting video games that Microsoft Studios and Sega will make more of these video games than Sony Computer Entertainment and Nintendo, I hope Sega and Microsoft Studios must team up making a whole lot of parachuting video games you know for sure.".

Nomination of Alltynex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alltynex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alltynex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]