User talk:Justin15w

Your question on Wafer (electronics)

Please see Talk:Wafer_(electronics)#Lithography. Moxfyre (ǝɹʎℲxoɯ | contrib) 20:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources: Tattle-Tape; Platform technology; Greenland; Propylene glycol; Scalpel; Integrated circuit packaging
Cleanup: Activated carbon; Mitral valve stenosis; Game localization
Expand: Integrated circuit; Artificial kidney; Three-dimensional integrated circuit
Unencyclopaedic: Technopaganism; Technoself; Wave soldering

Wikify: Physics of failure; Liver support systems; Technology broking
Orphan: Nathan W. Levin; Reference designator; Peritoneal equilibration test
Merge: Technology strategy; Ethics of technology; Valve RF amplifier
Stub: TO-3; Flatpack (electronics); Terotechnology; Nothypsa; Shahid (name); Gradiometer

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
319	Tobacco pipe (talk)	Add sources
65	DX Group (talk)	Add sources
333	Dental composite (talk)	Add sources
10,920	California (talk)	Add sources
175	Video game rating system (talk)	Add sources
211	Sword of the Berserk: Guts' Rage (talk)	Add sources
544	Symbol (chemistry) (talk)	Cleanup
48	Abraham Lincoln High School (San Francisco) (talk)	Cleanup
1,882	Beaver (talk)	Cleanup
132,566	Hillary Clinton (talk)	Expand
42	Strickland v. Sony (talk)	Expand
138	Pharmacogenetics (talk)	Expand
142	Dental amalgam controversy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
521	Crown (dentistry) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
26,591	Ronald Reagan (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19	National Audiovisual Institute (Finland) (talk)	Merge
442	Pharmacodynamics (talk)	Merge
13	Bonded amalgam (talk)	Merge
9	Initial volume of distribution (talk)	Wikify
30	International Age Rating Coalition (talk)	Wikify
300	Amalgam (chemistry) (talk)	Wikify
28	A Woman Hitting a Neo-Nazi With Her Handbag (talk)	Orphan
7	Aseptic sampling (talk)	Orphan
2	Andrew J. Richards (talk)	Orphan
16	Battus (butterfly) (talk)	Stub
226	Deep Down (video game) (talk)	Stub
17	Battus philenor hirsuta (talk)	Stub
61	Fever (The Black Keys song) (talk)	Stub
18	Rate of infusion (talk)	Stub
13	Irreversible agonist (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feminine hygiene

That was a content dispute, not vandalism; I had originally misinterpreted the edits as vandalism, which led to a misunderstanding. It's been sorted out now, and I doubt page protection will be necessary. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 00:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Understood and apologize for getting in the way. Justin15w (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a big deal, but try not to make the same mistake I made: don't revert too quickly. Anyway, thanks for understanding. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 00:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Justin15w. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Justin15w, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison with other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello Justin. Thank you for your attention to my edits on Davor Dzalto. While I was clearly trolling it was for a purpose. Please review Dzalto's page and clean up how shamelessly self-promotional it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.216.192.82 (talk) 23:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@76.216.192.82: This has already been addressed in Talk:Davor Džalto. Justin15w (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your opinion, but I am only making the article more accurate.

Thank you for your time. LmL (talk) 01:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your message: Hello, I'm Justin15w. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Emperor Yang of Sui have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Justin15w (talk) 01:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't know what your defintiion of "constructive" is, but I think your undoing was unconstructive. I changed "khan" into "khagan". Do you have any problem with that? A waste of my time, that is what it is. Rather ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HuMo (talk • contribs) 16:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HuMo — Preceding unsigned comment added by HuMo (talk • contribs) 16:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HuMo: Hi there. The reason I reverted your edit is because it turned a wikilink into a red link that doesn't lead anywhere, degrading the article quality. If you feel your edit was constructive, feel free to add it again, ensuring the wikilinks remain active, with a good summary as to why it was changed. It's nothing personal. Thanks. Justin15w (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

recent revert

You recently reverted some content on Purdue University Northwest. Please report libelous edits to oversight-en-wp@wikipedia.org . By the way, the section immediately below this seems to be messing up your page. Thanks John from Idegon (talk) 01:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I tried to fix it, but I suck at HTML. John from Idegon (talk) 01:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Me too! I can't figure it out. I asked the Teahouse. I'll also keep that email address available for future reference. Thanks! Justin15w (talk) 01:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A New Anti-Vandalism Award for you

	A lick from Holly
	To a fellow anti-vandal patroller (and springer spaniel lover) I'm sending Holly to thank you for your contributions XyzSpaniel Talk Page 20:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from STiki!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Justin15w! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Justin15w. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dire wolf

Hello Justin, thankyou for your frustrating defence of the Dire wolf page recently; the matter is "now before the courts" [[1]]. Keep up the good work. Regards, William Harris |talk 20:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@William Harris: Thank you kindly, William. I figured that account was a sock but noticed he stopped editing for a bit. Justin15w (talk) 21:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is only a matter of time before the entity starts again, let us hope we can nip that in the bud with a blanket ban on all three accounts. Regards, William Harris |talk 21:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I notice that you have the option of using both Twinkle and Stiki as a tool - which do you prefer and are there times to use one in preference to the other? William Harris |talk 21:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@William Harris: I like them both for different uses. I use Twinkle for Recent Changes patrolling, or when I'm using my phone, or when I'm patrolling at work on breaks - generally just to fight gross vandalism. STiki uses a java program and combines the warnings, reversions, and potential reporting to AIV into one click. Really makes it easy and fast, but often I need to go into my web browser to gain the context of the edits in question on the wiki page itself. It's better to really dive into edit reverting and take a closer look beyond the typical vandalism. Hope this helps! Take care, Justin15w (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, enjoy! Regards, William Harris |talk 21:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Justin, the outcome was a 48 hour ban with a warning - the system works and is lenient in the first instance. This at least adds some "history" to that Talk page. Regards, William Harris |talk 19:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Bandiera

I know for a fact that Bobby Bandiera's birthdate is Oct 19, 1953. If you go on one his Facebook pages "Bobby Bandiera Rocks" , you will see that the people who know him well are in agreement with me.

Thanks Jules323 (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jules323: I googled his information and it appeared to me that the existing birth date was correct, but as always I could be completely wrong. "Bobby Bandiera Rocks" is a closed group so I am unable to check it. I'll stop reverting you but you may want to seek consensus from other editors at the talk page: Talk:Bobby Bandiera. Nothing personal and good luck! Justin15w (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Myron Ebell

Hi, Justin. I appreciate your quick revert of the latest IP at Myron Ebell! I've now configured Pending changes to keep that kind of driveby vandalism off. Bishonen | talk 16:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: Thank you! I don't take kindly to BLP violations. Keep up the good work and see you around. Justin15w (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Dictatorship page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Just checked my lab results which noted you updated it 3 hours ago. Thanks for your input. 3 hours ago I was cleaning up after supper!

Louise

bad craic

story. dont get an fadhb con mi edits at all. 什么意思？你有问题吗？was just hypotheticalling michál Di Oh hIgín my lad. Stanvixx (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Christianity page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Justin, Thanks so much for correcting my spelling error "Coalminers'" Thanks for trimming the title, too. WarrenRicheyKid (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zephyr Headwear

First off, thank you for your feedback! I'm new to Wikipedia and appreciate you reviewing the article I drafted. I'll make the change that you suggested to make the article not sound promotional. I'll work on adding more information so it's not just a stub.

Also, it would be great if you edited the article to some extent (if possible) so I'm not the only one who has worked on it. I don't want it to be deleted since it's notable and deserves an article. Thanks again. Pwgormley (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pwgormley: You're welcome! I will take a look this weekend. If the article is ever in danger of deletion, let me know. We can move it to draft space if needed. Justin15w (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I indicated that I'm familiar with WP:COI and WP:COIADVICE on the Zephyr Headwear talk page. If you could remove the COI tag in the article, that'd be great. I won't be making any significant changes to the page. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pwgormley (talk • contribs) 18:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pwgormley::

Done If you find more material or sources you'd like to add later, feel free to send me a note and I'll review. I'll probably try to hunt down a logo to add to the page as well. Thanks and take care, Justin15w (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, I'll let you know if I find more sources. Here is a link to the current logo. Pwgormley (talk) 00:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Thanks again Pwgormley (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hello Justin15w. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 15,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Justin15w,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 807 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:MAKS Air Show

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MAKS Air Show. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While On The Subject Of Dogs

Apropos dogs and reducing error in the world, I was recently corrected in the nicest possible way. I was out running, and I saw a man walkng two large, handsome, French poodles in the park.

I've found talking to people about their dogs an efficient way of making friends since I was about four or five, so I told him, "They're very handsome. I'm told the poodles are the most intelligent of all the dogs. I think it's a pity they been bred into idiocy by rich, idle women who want an animal they can carry around in their handbags. And they've done that to the fine Russian hunting poodle in a hundred years flat."

He didn't even bother with "Well, not quite." He put me right with, "Yes, Cicero made exactly the same complaint in the Senate..."

Cheers, David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 19:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Justin15w,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 807 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of water wheel

Thanks for reverting that silly deletion. You got there just before me! That ip address has history so I have reported it. Malcolm Boura (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Malcolm.boura: No problem. I find myself reverting a whole lot IP edits from the educational system. Widr (the admin) is usually REALLY good about taking care of them. Thanks and take care! Justin15w (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Sirius

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sirius. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:American Pekin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Pekin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Microscope

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microscope. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Justin15w,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 807 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Robert Mueller

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Mueller. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Calendar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Google memo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google memo. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Please comment on Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bay Area Rapid Transit. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LTA

LTA = long-term abuse. Pretty sure I've seen this wanker before. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 16:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Storming of the Bastille

Storming of the Bastille has been vandalized again. Can you get it protected please? Roberttherambler (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Meg Patterson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Meg Patterson. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Why did you remove my boom

Yaboijosh (talk) 16:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Abortion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abortion. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Steve Bannon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Bannon. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Justin15w. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:?Oumuamua

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:?Oumuamua. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Please comment on Talk:BMW

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Please comment on Talk:International System of Units

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International System of Units. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Windows Server 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Windows Server 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Justin15w, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of most visited museums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most visited museums. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:ZFS

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ZFS. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Justin15w. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate to the talk pages consultation

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Hosts

Hello. Over at the Teahouse we're having a bit of a 'spring clean' by removing old entries from the list of Hosts that new users see. As you don't appear to have been very active there for some time, your 'host profile' has been removed from the list. But please don't let that put you off contributing again in the future - either by signing back up as a Host to assist on a regular basis, or just dropping in whenever you fancy helping out.

Thank you for all your past help and support for new users at the Teahouse. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]