User talk:Melodies1917

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Excellent job on updating the Before_I_Fall through including a new citation for a WP:Citation needed and cleaning up original research. This small improvements to the articles, make a major impact as they add up across the encylopedia. Keep up the great work! Sadads (talk) 02:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

I'm guessing the Tommy Boy categories will have to be manually renamed, but I don't know how that works. You put each category on the articles that belong in the categories, and once the old categories don't have any articles in them, then I guess we'll find out.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Melodies1917. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Finneas

Hi why did you undo what I did?96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you did not add a reference to your claim, and also he's just credited as the character's name, not nickname, on IMDB.Melodies1917 (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the reference two of them

here is the clip on him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyO635BBySM

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3906552/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

Thanks96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quote Finneas O'Connell is an American actor and musician who plays Alistaire in the Fox TV series Glee and stars as Shane in the award winning independent feature Life Inside Out. He is also known for his portrayal of the character Spencer (Twilight) in Columbia Pictures' Bad Teacher, has a recurring role on ABC's Modern Family and appears in the premiere episode of "Aquarius".

Finneas began writing songs at the age of 12. He is the front man and lead singer/songwriter of the band, The Slightlys, whose song, "Is There Anybody There" appeared in an episode of ABC Family's Switched At Birth. The band has won numerous awards and competitions in the Los Angeles area. - IMDb Mini Biography By: TBD Public Relations

Thanks:96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here on when it's acceptable to use IMDB as a source on Wikipedia. That bio was also basically copied and pasted onto Wikipedia, which I fixed and found a couple better references for. Melodies1917 (talk) 17:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Trying to move Tommy Boy Records to Tommy Boy Music--shouldn't this be the name of the page since https://www.tommyboy.com/history calls it Tommy Boy Music LLC at the bottom? However Tommy Boy Music (and Tommy Boy Entertainment) both exist as redirect pages so it's very tricky to rename/move all of the three. Thanks, Melodies1917 (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Melodies1917 - See here for instructions on how to request a page move. -- Thanks, Alfie. ^{talk to me | contribs} 19:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, just added. Melodies1917 (talk) 19:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Melodies1917. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Activated cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Activated cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i know im replying to a bot right now but that was uploaded to be placed on Activated (the Tee Grizzley album) but looks like someone replaced the image a few days ago.Melodies1917 (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajion Neal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memphis Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norman Fucking Rockwell (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Waiting for more preview articles for the album.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norman Fucking Rockwell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Norman Fucking Rockwell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Melodies1917! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:17, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milbank LLP logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roger Gold (music executive) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Gold (music executive) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Gold (music executive) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. N Ø 19:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Melodies1917! You created a thread called i think an article is WP:TOOSOON but not sure how to get other editors involved for feedback. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Lover" (Taylor Swift song)

A reliably sourced description of a live performance of the song isn't relevant to a section called "Live performances"? Please have a go-through of some featured/good quality articles to familiarise yourself with the know-hows of this. ~~Your removal of things which you (very unreasonably) deem "irrelevant" and "weird to include" is getting to be out of hand~~.—N Ø 15:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MaranoFan: "Getting out of hand?" It was twice. How is the fact that she played the song on a pink guitar against a moon backdrop encyclopedic? Also, another editor agreed with me to remove the picture of Joe Alwyn, andn how many other taylor swift song articles include pictures of the subject, and describe in detail the way they were first performed live? That sounds like the start of coatracking, which would be "getting out of hand". Also, I was at the VMAs, the moons werent even there--they were a TV effect, just like the rainbows during "you need to calm down".Melodies1917 (talk) 15:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That fact is encyclopaedic because it is an objective description of the performance which was covered by a secondary reliable source, and provides insight to the reader as well. That’s why you were told to refer some quality articles, because information about performances has historically always been covered on them. I don't have time to provide specific examples, please find those on your own. Thanks. And regarding your removal of the Joe Alwyn pic, the fact remains that your edit summary about it being "weird to include" was not good enough. Someone else doing the same two days later with a proper explanation does not rectify your lacking explanation.—N Ø 16:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DNA Genetics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DNA Genetics, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 08:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Taylor Swift Lover Fest poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Taylor Swift Lover Fest poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Album draft

Can you make any new edits to Draft:Kelsea (album) (as well as moving it into the article namespace if possible)?? Georgia guy (talk) 16:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sure! happy to help! Melodies1917 (talk) 17:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The use of "the" with a band name

See WP:THEBAND. I assume you haven't seen it based on this edit. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gary Spangler

The article Gary Spangler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Melodies1917,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! D🎉ggy54321 ^{(happy new year!)} 02:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Orphaned non-free image File:Universal Music Group logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Universal Music Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum Metric moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Quantum Metric, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Quantum Metric logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Quantum Metric logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Sims 4 Strangerville Cover Art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Sims 4 Strangerville Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantum Metric (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Standard press releases, notices and interviews. See also WP:FORBES.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quantum Metric and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quantum Metric, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2008 Universal Studios fire, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 19:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc Strange: sorry about that! i was aware of original research but i see now the issue with WP:SYNTH but its a little bit confusing. just so i am clear, for example, would an article talking about The Roots vinyl reiusses like in this edit [[1]] that clearly states something like "the masters were previously reported to have been destroyed in the Universal fire", or something along those lines, be suitable? thanks! Melodies1917 (talk) 16:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc Strange: hi, any other thoughts here? appreciate any further insight! thanks. Melodies1917 (talk) 16:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but that reference doesn't mention the fire in any way. Rosen's NYT articles does not identify many, if any, specific recordings that were considered to have been destroyed, including these Roots albums. Earlier in the 2008 Universal Studios fire article, there's the passage: Determining which recordings had been destroyed, or how much of an artist's discography had been affected, was impossible, he wrote. For example, Rosen said it was difficult to confirm whether the Neil Young recordings listed in the documents were the original master tapes of the albums he recorded for Geffen Records in the 1980s, or session outtakes from those records.
The current Wiki article as it stands does not state that these specific Roots albums were reported to have been destroyed. I think mentioning the Roots albums without a source that outright mentions the fire, or quotes the band members about the fire and discovery of these specific recordings as not being affected counts as WP:SYNTH. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 17:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Milbank LLP logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milbank LLP logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 13:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Quantum Metric

Hello, Melodies1917. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quantum Metric, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Quantum Metric

Hello, Melodies1917. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Quantum Metric".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MikeWorldWide logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MikeWorldWide logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Casetify article

Hi @Melodies1917, thanks again for your help with the Casetify article. I placed a few additional suggested edits on the article's Talk page and I'm wondering if you have thoughts or feedback about them. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you. SBCornelius (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey, no problem. i'll go take a look!Melodies1917 (talk) 22:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Melodies1917 Hi again! Thanks for your time on this. Have you had a chance to take a look? It would be great to hear your thoughts. Thanks again. SBCornelius (talk) 14:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Geoff Warburton

The article Geoff Warburton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reliable coverage limited to a bunch of articles discussing his Big Machine signing, all of which restate each other so there's no point in adding any of it. That means the article will not be expanding beyond its current state any time soon, and as is this is a blatant WP:NOTDATABASE vio.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoff Warburton (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geoff Warburton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NP83 (talk) 04:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Geoff Warburton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geoff Warburton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Warburton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]