Jump to content

User talk:Mohamed Ouda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of Gourmet Ads

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gourmet Ads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Gourmet Ads. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Gourmet Ads. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Even if you believe that the new references you add address the issue of notability, you still mustn't remove speedy deletion tags from articles you have created. You have to leave it for an administrator or an uninvolved regular editor to make that call (which means that you shouldn't ask other people to remove the tag either - you need to leave it to run its course.)

The Reuters reference is not a reliable source, since it is a press release. Once again, please do take the time to familiarise yourself with what English Wikipedia requires when it comes to reliable sources. Thank you! bonadea contributions talk 07:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Right to Succeed for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Right to Succeed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right to Succeed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 12:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Hi Mohamed, thanks a lot for getting photos of the Russian cultural centre in Cairo -- it's much appreciated. Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 17:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Jefferson, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Jefferson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 14:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Credo Reference account is approved

[edit]

Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.

  • Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent. You'll receive the email within about two weeks.
  • If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
  • Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
  • Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
  • If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 19:40, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Today's featured article/September 9, 2012, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 9, 2012. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. VWBot (talk) 10:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO   A&E⇑ 10:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!

[edit]

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

  • If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
  • If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Bromley for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Bromley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bromley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 05:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa

[edit]

Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabell@doualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahf@africacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Chen for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Chen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Chen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 10:03, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Temsah

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Temsah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:18, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Bromley

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Bromley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 18:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got e-mail

[edit]
Hello, Mohamed Ouda. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

-- Thuvack | talk 06:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:13, Friday, November 8, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


Is there a place for Wikipedia in Africa?

[edit]

As an active editor on Wikipedia, Wikimedia South Africa has pleasure in inviting you to Wiki Indaba 2014 which will be held in Johannesburg from 20 – 22 June 2014.

This conference will be a gathering of African Wikimedians and other open knowledge volunteers who are aligned to the mission of Wikipedia. It is also the first step towards the establishment of African co-operative structures and organs that make up Wikimedia Chapters, Wikimedians and mission aligned Thematic Organisations.

For more information or to apply for a scholarship, please visit link WikiIndaba 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humetheresa (talk • contribs) 10:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rites of Assent

[edit]

Sorry for having missed it, but I just read your reply about en:Rites of Assent. In the English article I added the Arabic name of the book collection. Thank you so much for finding it!

Now that I know about the Arabic title, are you interested in starting a stub about the collection at: المهدي وطرف من خبر الآخرة‎? WhisperToMe (talk) 20:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Mohamed Ouda! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:12, Friday, February 20, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together
[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Joel Goldstein, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://joelgoldstein.com/who-is-joel-goldstein/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Joel Goldstein saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! WordSeventeen (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about Dialectal Wikipedias

[edit]

I invite you to participate in an online Skype Discussion about the subject of Tunisian Wikipedia. If you want this, suscribe here.--Csisc (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joel Goldstein for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Goldstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Goldstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

[edit]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Mohamed Ouda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TE Data Logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TE Data Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mohamed Ouda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved back to draft

[edit]

It is very bad form to copy a rejected draft article to main space without addressing the concerns of the reviewer. I have moved Stevie Thomas (restauranteur) back to Draft:Stevie Thomas (restauranteur) because all you did was delete some sections without improving on the sources, none of which show any in-depth coverage of the subject. Please improve it there. The main space article title is now protected from recreation. Once the sourcing is improved to demonstrate notability of the subject, an administrator may move the draft to main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

مرحبا

[edit]

اراسل مجموعة من المستخدمين الإداريين في ويكيبيديا العربية، كما أراسلك بصفتك مستخدم ذو صلاحيات إدارية، معبرا عن امتعاضي الشديد لأنه تم منعي في ويكيبيديا العربية حتى من تعديل صفحتي الخاصة. ولأنه تم تخريب صفحتي بشكل تعسفي تنمري من طرف بعض العناصر التي تستغل صلاحياتها في ممارسة التجاوزات في حقي كمحرر ويكيبيدي وكمدون.

كما أطالب برفع التضييق والتنمر علي في ويكيبيديا العربية من طرف بعض العناصر التي تستغل صلاحيات إدارية لممارسة التنمر.

فعندما قررت الانسحاب من ويكيبيديا العربية، تركت ملاحظة عن تجربتي الويكيبيدية في صفحتي الخاصة، وبعد مدة يتم حذف الملاحظة التي تعبر عن رأيي الشخصي، ويزيدون عن ذلك منعي من التحرير والتعديل حتى على صفحتي الشخصية.

وتم مسح كل شيء على صفحتي لما فيعا صناديقي وقائمة مقالاتي ومساهماتي الجيدة والمختارة، بما في ذلك الملاحظة النقدية التي تعبر عن وجهة نظري الخاصة.

ولهذا أطالب برفع الحيف واستعادة ملاحظاتي أو على أقل تقدبر، استعادت صفحتي إلى حدود تاريخ الحذف التعسف الذي فام به عباس في الرابط الذي يوضح الفرق أدناه. وسبب المشكل ابتدأ مع التشكي من إبراهيم الذي لا يتوقف عن ممارسة التنمر الالكتروني واستغلال صلاحياته في التسلط العشوائي المضر والهدام لروح العمل التشاركي والقيم الفكرية والويكيبيدية وروح الاحترام المتبادل. 

وفي الختام تقبلوا أنتم جميعا مهما اختلفت آراءكم وتوجهات تحية ملؤها المودة وروح الحوار والحرية والقيم المدنية والفكرية الحرة.

رابط آخر حذف للملاحظة قبل الاجهاز على صفحتي كاملة من قبل بعض المتعسفين:

  • وهو ما أطالب باسترجاعه إلى حدود حذف المستخدم عباس كأقل تقدير مع رفع المنع عني ومعاقبة المستخدم إبراهيم الذي تسبب في مقاطعتي لويكيبيديا بسبب التنمر والمضايقة الشديدة:


https://ar.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=مستخدم:محمد_بوعلام_عصامي&diff=28812263&oldid=28777380

محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Simo.Boualam» (talk) 01:05, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Norman Grace (Filmmaker)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Norman Grace (Filmmaker) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly Hyman (lawyer)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kelly Hyman (lawyer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly Hyman (lawyer)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kelly Hyman (lawyer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

[edit]
Stop icon

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A request has been filed for the title of Kelly Hyman (lawyer) requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our notability guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and grounds for a block. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mohamed Ouda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Mohamed Ouda. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mohamed Ouda. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mohamed Ouda|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 02:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EverlyWell for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EverlyWell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EverlyWell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet and this is my only account and I don't have any other accounts Mohamed Ouda (talk) 14:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So, even accepting your version of events, your actions here would be in violation of the WP:PROXYING policy, as the users who you helped appear to be blocked paid editors, making this block valid. In a wider question, you’ll need to explain how articles you created have word-for-word copying from articles created by blocked accounts and why some of them follow formats we’d expect for paid editors on this project. If you have edited for pay, you’ll need to disclose it in your next unblock request. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mohamed Ouda - I did not block you, and I think that the reason for the block is incorrect. I do not think that you should have been blocked for sockpuppetry. You were blocked by User:Yunshui. Your editing shows that your edits to the English Wikipedia do give the appearance of undisclosed paid editing, and I would not disagree with a block for undisclosed paid editing. The titles that you have given to articles that you created, such as Kelly Hyman (lawyer), when there is no need for disambiguation, appear to be gaming the system. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really want your editing on the English Wikipedia to result in stewards or the Wikimedia Foundation globally blocking you? Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ∯WBG , they are online friends from social media , and I don't know their on-wiki account . and I select the articles which I think suitable to be published on Wikipedia . Mohamed Ouda (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It won't cost much to be more truthful. Try that. ∯WBGconverse 15:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Mohamed Ouda - If what you are saying is true, and that you have created or promoted these articles for friends that you have made on social media, and that you have not been paid, then you have nonetheless been using your knowledge of Wikipedia to assist your friends in gaming the system to create articles. If you have in fact been selecting the articles that you think are suitable to be published on Wikipedia based on your judgment, then you have shown, and should learn, that you apparently do not understand what are notable articles for the English Wikipedia and should not be disrupting the English Wikipedia by evading create-protection. If so, you have disrupted the English Wikipedia just as much as you would have by paid editing, for nothing. If so, you would have done better for yourself to get paid, and it would have been just as disruptive to the English Wikipedia. If you really want to re-instate your account on the English Wikipedia, my advice would be to admit that you are a paid editor, and accept an infinite (not indefinite) topic-ban from creating articles in article space, and you might be unblocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Yunshui - It is clear to me that User:Mohamed Ouda is not a sockpuppet. They have been editing the English Wikipedia since 2008. They have been creating articles inappropriately, and that is blockable, but it is not sockpuppetry. (If they have been a sockpuppeteer, that is a different issue.) I suggest that their block be lifted, although it may then be immediately replaced by another block for disruptive editing and probable undisclosed paid editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Given the issue I have raised at AN of also proxying for a banned editor, I'd suggest that the block stays as-is until the details are straightened out. Black Kite (talk) 23:38, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly accept my apologizes and below are the list of paid editing articles I contributed in it

User:TonyBallioni - Thank you. I am willing to leave the matter alone for now. We have a deep disconnect between his status on the Arabic Wikipedia and on the English Wikipedia. There is nothing that we can do here on the English Wikipedia about that. I would have preferred a community ban, but I see that this is a case where the policy against outing is used as a shield to hide behind. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Right to Succeed for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Right to Succeed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right to Succeed (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 19:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is now more than 6 months from my block , and I understood my mistake and wish to contribute again in English Wikipedia Mohamed Ouda (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my block was for Advertising , I reviews Wikipedia polices and I will not create articles for Advertising again and will make useful contributions only .

Decline reason:

That's very unspecific. Above you were asked to provide a full list of articles you have edited for pay. You haven't done so. You have not described what kinds of contribution we can expect now that you know Wikipedia is not an advertising tool. Huon (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Huon , kindly find below the full list of articles

And now you can expect from me useful articles with neutral point of view without any advertising Mohamed Ouda (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can request another review of your block, but I don't think that list is complete, and I don't think "useful articles with neutral point of view without any advertising" is specific enough. Huon (talk) 10:54, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
yes This is the complete list , and could you please explain how can I be be more specific Huon Mohamed Ouda (talk) 11:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I find it very hard to believe that Tres Birds Workshop was not a work-for-hire, and I rather doubt adding that one to the list would make it complete. And you could, for example, describe the topics you are interested in or give specific examples of pages you want to work on. Huon (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - not to belabour the point, but I remember at least two other articles connected to Paul Wilson, and a cursory look over this talk page's history shows a number of other articles that would need to be included in the list. --bonadea contributions talk 13:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Huon , I added Tres Birds Workshop to the list , and I forgot it as it is deleted article . I just want a second change and I want to work in Egypt related articles Mohamed Ouda (talk) 18:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, you are welcome to request another review of your block; you can again use the {{unblock}} template for this purpose. I still don't think the list is complete. What about Norman Grace (Filmmaker) and Kelly Hyman (lawyer)? Those too have been deleted, but you can find the deletion notifications further up on this page. Huon (talk) 22:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my block was for Advertising , I reviewed and understated Wikipedia polices and I will not create articles for Advertising and I I want a second chance to work in Egypt related articles with with neutral point of view and below are the list of articles which I have edited with ads

Mohamed Ouda (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What I see here on this page casts sufficient doubt on your integrity and the credibility of your promises to not edit for pay in the future to warrant leaving the block in place. Failing to disclose paid edits is a fundamentally dishonest act; that it took us that much effort to get you to make those disclosures is not encouraging. MER-C 17:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Hi Mohamad Ouda, so, as I think you probably know, I do some work behind the scenes with ar.wiki and so am somewhat familiar with this case both from the original block and this appeal. I have mixed feelings here. People I trust (such as علاء) have vouched for you to me privately, and I consider that worth a lot. At the same time, I do think Huon raises legitimate concerns. I think a way to deal with this as a compromise would be to require that you not create any articles on companies or living people as a condition of your unblock. This would allow you to contribute to articles on Egypt, while preventing you from editing articles that are most likely to be used by advertisers.
    @Yunshui and Huon: would the two of you be fine with this conditional unblock. I highly value both of your opinions, so I'd like to hear them. Mohamad Ouda, Yunshui doesn't edit on the weekends, and it is custom on en.wiki not to unblock without discussing with the blocking admin first, so it will likely be a few days. Sorry for the delay, but unblocks are busy here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TonyBallioni thank you for your reply , and I am OK with the condition I will not create articles about companies or living people and all my work will be on historic topics Mohamed Ouda (talk) 08:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Mohamed Ouda to even admit to paid editing has been rather like pulling teeth...
"I wasn't getting paid, they were just friends..."
"Okay, not so much friends as people on social media..."
"Okay, I was paid, but only for these articles..."
"Well alright, there were a few others..."
"Yeah, that's definitely all of them."
"Ah, well now that you mention it there were a few more..."
Given that history, I don't really see a good reason to trust this user, and I'm thus not exactly in favour of unblocking, even with the proposed restriction. However, I won't raise any objection if you guys see fit to do so. Yunshui 雲水 09:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mohamed Ouda, as per WP:Paid, can you please provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services e.g. your Upwork account etc? If you don't advertise anywhere then can you please explain how you were hired to create these pages? Thank you GSS (talk|c|em) 07:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GSS My accounts are

and I was hired to create pages by bidding on requests of creating articles Mohamed Ouda (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is the seventh time you are disclosing something new when asked and each time it sounds like "Oh, I forget to tell you this and that". Do you have anything else to tell? GSS (talk|c|em) 04:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (talk|c|em) , No I don't have else to tell , and the problem is those pages were created over long period of time so that why I forgot some of them , but above is the full listMohamed Ouda (talk) 08:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But that's also not correct. Remembering all the pages you created or edited for pay several years later must be difficult, I understand that, but it only takes a few minutes of looking through your talk page history to find e.g. Black Media Month, DVDLink.ca, Ensquared, Clinton Cimring, and The Calm Centre - and that's only some of the articles not mentioned in the list above. I wasn't going to post about this since you said you'll only work with articles that are unrelated to living people and existing companies and products, but your reply to GSS is a little bit concerning. --bonadea contributions talk 10:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello bonadea' , those articles here deleted since 2010 and I don't see them in my contributions or my current version of talk page that is why I forgot everything about them Mohamed Ouda (talk) 17:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yunshui , I wish I can have new opportunity and new start to make helpful contributions on en Wikipedia Mohamed Ouda (talk) 22:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please TonyBallioni when I can reapply for the unblock . I just needs a second chance Mohamed Ouda (talk) 15:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm personally not in favour of unblocking this user. I was looking at both on and off-wiki stuff and found him untrustworthy and non-cooperative when it comes to identifying his paid edits. @Mohamed Ouda you have a lot more to disclose than what you have mentioned above. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can make a new appeal at any time, but you need to address the concerns others have. I’m more open to conditionally unblocking than others, but I’m also not going to unblock against consensus here. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GSS , I already disclose all articles I remembered . and if there were me I appreciate you to list it here Mohamed Ouda (talk) 15:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is a year now since my block , I understand the lesson and reviewed Wikipedia polices and I will not create articles for Advertising and I I want a second chance to work in Egypt related articles with with neutral point of view and below are the list of articles which I have edited with ads

Mohamed Ouda (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What I see here on this page casts sufficient doubt on your integrity and the credibility of your promises to not edit for pay in the future to warrant leaving the block in place. Failing to disclose paid edits is a fundamentally dishonest act; that it took us that much effort to get you to make those disclosures is not encouraging. MER-C 17:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Hi Mohamad Ouda, so, as I think you probably know, I do some work behind the scenes with ar.wiki and so am somewhat familiar with this case both from the original block and this appeal. I have mixed feelings here. People I trust (such as علاء) have vouched for you to me privately, and I consider that worth a lot. At the same time, I do think Huon raises legitimate concerns. I think a way to deal with this as a compromise would be to require that you not create any articles on companies or living people as a condition of your unblock. This would allow you to contribute to articles on Egypt, while preventing you from editing articles that are most likely to be used by advertisers.
    @Yunshui and Huon: would the two of you be fine with this conditional unblock. I highly value both of your opinions, so I'd like to hear them. Mohamad Ouda, Yunshui doesn't edit on the weekends, and it is custom on en.wiki not to unblock without discussing with the blocking admin first, so it will likely be a few days. Sorry for the delay, but unblocks are busy here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 3

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It a year since I was blocked , I learned the lesson and hope in a second chance to edit and create articles related to Egypt and Arab world geography Mohamed Ouda (talk) 10:19, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You worked hard to lie and mislead us at every opportunity, including in August and September of last year. I don't see any way you can regain the trust of the community after you worked so hard to lose it. I am declining this unblock request on its merits. As this is now the sixth unblock request you've had declined, I am revoking talk page access. WP:UTRS is available to you if you can come up with a specific plan to earn back the trust of the community after you repeatedly lied to us. Yamla (talk) 12:34, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of EverlyWell for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EverlyWell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EverlyWell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS 💬 17:30, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #74093

[edit]

is closed. Maybe in six months. But skimming here, I have doubts -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:57, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I do not discuss unblocking via email. As you have lost talk page access, you will need to use UTRS. There is a concern with lost trust amid the spectre of undisclosed paid editing. I sense an urgency to your desire to be unblocked. You are able to edit on other projects, but you are desirous of unblocking here. . . . If you can adequately address these concerns, feel free to submit another request via UTRS. I see contradictory information from people I trust. I would value input from @TonyBallioni and Yamla:. It is possible we could restore talk page access and carry your request to WP:AN. We will see. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #86658

[edit]

TPA restored. Per the WP:GAB, user is reminded-- "Write your request yourself; requests that appear to be written with an AI bot or chatbot are likely to be summarily rejected. The reviewer wants to hear from you, not an AI." -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked now for more than 4 years now and , and in this time I changed my mindset , and contributed in Arabic Wikipedia , and added new photos and videos on commons , and now I full understand that my actions violated Wikipedia's policies, and I apologize for the disruption they caused, and to gain the trust I promise I will make a new start here and will add new information in geography and science articles and will not edit any articles related to live persons. Mohamed Ouda (talk) 09:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You saying your actions were wrong is a start, but once trust is destroyed, it is very hard to get back. See The Boy Who Cried Wolf. You should go into detail about why you lied about your actions, why you failed to disclose your paid editing, and why we should now trust you. You probably won't get too many more chances to do this at this time, so make it count. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This does not address your WP:UPE and doesn't address your repeated lies to us. --Yamla (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla , I confess this was totally wrong behavior . and I just want a new opportunity to gain the trust of the community I will never make paid edits again . Mohamed Ouda (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This still doesn't address your repeated lies to us. Frankly, I don't think you are a good candidate to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohamed Ouda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want a new opportunity , I admit I was wrong , and regarding why I lied about my previous actions and failed to disclose my paid editing, I must acknowledge that I made bad choices caused by misguided priorities. , At that time, I was focused on immediate gains rather than considering the long-term consequences of my actions. but this action was from 4 years ago , and now my mindset totally changed and I realize the importance of transparency and honesty in Wikipedia. As for why you should trust me now, I want to assure that I have reflected on my past behavior and my mindset changed since then. and I have begin demonstrating this commitment through my contributions to Arabic Wikipedia and Commons, where I have focused on adding valuable content . I understand that trust is not easily regained, but I am willing to work hard to rebuild it. I am committed to making a positive impact on Wikipedia and strictly adhering to the policies. Mohamed Ouda (talk) 08:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I've already reviewed a request, I can't review another, someone else will review your current request. 331dot (talk) 06:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a limited number of admins, who are volunteers. Please be patient, this may not be reviewed soon. 331dot (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mohamed_Ouda&oldid=1229965592"