User talk:Mrtraska

Welcome!

Hello, Mrtraska, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 04:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering

if you have q reference for what Louis Sullivan said about Graham, Anderson, Probst & White's work, or was it just a generic Sullivan rant? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing my entries! I was thinking of Sullivan's infamous comment regarding the two banks at the foot of La Salle Street, the Illinois Merchants Bank/Continental Illinois Bank Building and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, both GAP&W projects -- the gist of which was that the Beaux Arts/Classical design was so outdated that the bankers might as well wear togas -- and his disparaging remarks about the Beaux Arts style of the Columbian Exposition setting back architecture at least 50 years, which are from Sullivan's own writings and cited on his Wikipedia biography page. I thought these comments were well enough known, but perhaps not. (Mrtraska) 13 December 2011

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Berwyn Route 66 Museum.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lugia2453 (talk) 17:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Berwyn Route 66 Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

K7L (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed spindle to Spindle (sculpture) as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Route 66 Museum had a source identifying Berwyn as trying to bring back *that specific spindle* and not spindles in general. If this is incorrect, please feel free to revert. I've also added the museum infobox. I didn't check to see if we have any free images of Berwyn (although we do have some free Flickr CC-BY-SA photos for a similar museum in Pontiac); if you can find one of this specific museum, please add it. K7L (talk) 23:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that modification! Very helpful. I forgot that the reference to the artwork probably needed further disambiguation. Thanks also for inserting the box in the right-hand sidebar. I had thought about putting in the museum box muself but haven't found a free-use photograph of the museum yet.Mrtraska (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Doug Moran ID photo-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Doug Moran ID photo-1.jpg, which you've sourced to Doug Moran. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Doug Moran (author).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! DGG ( talk ) 23:10, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Douglas Moran (author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This has now been corrected: the link goes to Republican Party (United States). Mrtraska (talk) 14:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Douglas Moran.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Douglas Moran.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 19:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eeekster, please note that I merely posted a copy of an e-mail that was already sent to Wikimedia Commons by Doug Moran himself -- y'all need to read your mail! Could someone over there please look for that so that this problem stops resurfacing? Thanks! Mrtraska (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Judith Rabinor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Signalizing (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas Moran (author)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Douglas Moran (author), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Judith Rabinor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Judith Rabinor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of L. Sue Baugh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L. Sue Baugh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Sue Baugh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Berwyn Route 66 Museum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Berwyn Route 66 Museum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berwyn Route 66 Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mrtraska and thanks for your comments in the deletion discussion. The right place for those comments is on the main discussion page at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Berwyn_Route_66_Museum, rather than on the associated talk page. Really, there shouldn't be a separate talk page but I think every page on Wikipedia has one, whether it ought to or not. Anyway, don't worry – I copied your comments into the main discussion so you don't need to do anything to fix this. Also, since you were recommending that the page be kept, I added a boldface "Keep" to the start of your comment, which helps to summarise. Please delete that if I misunderstood your comment – seems unlikely, in this case, but I thought I should mention it. (By the way, only one comment per person should have a boldface tag like that so you shouldn't repeat it if you make more comments in the discussion.) Let me know if you need any more help on this, or if there's anything you don't understand about the process. I've put your talk page on my watchlist so I'll see any replies you make to this comment. Dricherby (talk) 23:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Dricherby, for the correction -- I'm new to contesting removals. Much appreciated.Mrtraska (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judith Rabinor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judith Rabinor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Rabinor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert P. Chappell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert P. Chappell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert P. Chappell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of musicians from Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bronzeville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This has been corrected. Mrtraska (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carbide & Carbon Building

added links pointing to Railway Exchange Building and Ernest Graham

U.S. Route 66 in Illinois

added a link pointing to Bascule

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; those are now corrected. Mrtraska (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited U.S. Route 66 in Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaux Arts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. this has been corrected. Mrtraska (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

London Guarantee Building

Thanks for your content contribution to London Guarantee Building. Please make sure to use WP:ICs from WP:RS for each all facts that you add. I noticed you added a few ICs, but you also added several facts without any ICs. I will remove these unsourced facts assuming that they are WP:OR if you don't add ICs from RSs to them.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the reference to London Guaranty & Accident Company, an insurance firm, was found in legal documents that were part of lawsuits; I have no idea how to reference them, nor would other people necessarily be able to find them online, though I'd suggest using Ixquick or Dogpile for a search. However, the company's name is inscribed above the building's entrance -- something you can see if you look carefully at a photograph of the building facade (i.e., it's self-evident from the photo) -- and the company's name is also mentioned on the Emporis page cited in another paragraph. As for the information on the London House, it's taken from the Wikipedia page on the London House; obviously, the citations for that page are there. So, I'm not clear: exactly what else do you think is missing an appropriate citation? Mrtraska (talk) 01:57, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mrtraska. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Douglas Moran.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Douglas Moran.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]