Jump to content

User talk:Oronsay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit with VisualEditor

Wikidata weekly summary #634

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #644

[edit]

This Month in GLAM: August 2024

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

  • The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
  • Wikimania presentation
  • New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in architecture

[edit]

Saturday 21 September 2024 Walking Tour and Wikipedia Edit-a-thon

[edit]

We‘re please to welcome the Wikipedia Walking Tour and Edit-a-thon for 2024. The two-part event will be running over two days, the walking tour on Saturday (for photos) and the edit-a-thon on Sunday.

This is a continuation from past edit-a-thons increase articles about women and non-binary people who work in architecture and related fields in or from Aotearoa New Zealand.

Please feel free to sign up to the dash board and contribute remotely, or attend in person if you are in Auckland - we appreciate all contributions.

Project link: A+W NZ Wikiproject Edit-a-thon 22 SEPTEMBER 2024 ~ Pakoire (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Pakoire, for this invitation. I may well find something architectural to contribute on the day. I won't, however, sign up to the dashboard as I'm bound to be editing on many other topics that weekend. Good luck with it. Oronsay (talk) 01:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - I understand. I always appreciate you input, especially tidying edits by new people. This time the focus is on expanding new articles so we will see how we go. Pakoire (talk) 01:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #645

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wikidata Weekly Summary #647

[edit]

<languages/>

Wikidata weekly summary #648

[edit]

This Month in GLAM: September 2024

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #649

[edit]
[edit]

Kia ora, I have tried repeatedly to get the link classifier gadget to work, but with no success. I am not sure what I am doing wrong. Could you please have a look at the file: User:Marshelec/common.js. Can you see anything wrong ? What else can I try ? I see that I don't have a page User:Marshelec/common.css. Does that matter ? What does it do anyway ?. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks, Marshelec (talk) 21:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, looks like it is now working. I think that whatever I tried previously for bypassing the cache didn't work, but cntl-F5 seems to have fixed it. It is working now. Sorry to trouble you.Marshelec (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problems. I'm pleased it's working for you now. Oronsay (talk) 23:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #650

[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #651

[edit]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Australian cricket team in England in 1890

[edit]

I don't know what your game is, but the 1890 Australians did not play some postponed Third Test at Manchester from 18-20 September 1890. Test match status is reserved to specific matches. The match mentioned was not a Test match. It was between 'An England XI' and the Australians. The fact that George Ulyett, a professional, captained the side speaks volumes. This match was not a Test match. FieldOfWheat (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #652

[edit]

Draft:DiJones_Real_Estate

[edit]

I am wondering if you can help me understand the deletion process? I have tried to submit this article again with much better news references (The Australian, Sydney Morning Hearld, Daily Telegraph) as well as industry websites like domain.com.au. I think that the article is important because it recognises the pioneering work of Di Jones (the person) and the company is effectively the legacy that Australians can see. I think it is importent for people who are encountering the company/brand to know about the history. I had no problem at all with my similar work on LJ Hooker, the man and the company when I worked on those articles. I don't want to specifically raise the issue of misogyny but it appears that the article has been rejected out of hand by UK editor Scope_creep who simply says "Real estate companies aren't notable' and rejects the article on the basis that the citations aren't good enough. I think that I have incorporated the requirements of TSventon Can you please suggest what I need to do before re-submitting the article? PinkAechFas (talk) 01:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is using the references for the women for the a company article and that doesn't cut it. Private real estate companies are not notable unless very well know or about long enough that they they have significance beyond there own existance, but that is not shown here. Your using this women, her notabilty to push this private company which is unacceptable referencing. It fails WP:NCORP. Also notability is not inherited so why are doing that. Lastly it reads like an promotional advert failing WP:PROMO and it not acceptable either. Wikipedia is not an advertising platform. That article is a mess. scope_creepTalk 07:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]