User talk:Pichsambath

March

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Information which is removed in the leagues articles don't have source. Please stop readding them without adding source. Information about the state is incorrect transcript, also please stop reverting that without explanation. Mnnie053 (talk) 10:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They have corrected the information about Cambodia incorrectly. As Cambodians, I have the right to keep the original form.

They have corrected the information about Cambodia incorrectly. As Cambodians, I have the right to keep the original form. Pichsambath (talk) 10:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pichsambath Please see Administrators' Noticeboard thread linked below. I believe the other user may have a behavioural issue here, participate in the thread if you have anything to say. AP 499D25 (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss with the other editor (either on article talk page or their user talk page, preferrably the former) if you see that they disagree with you, explaining why your edit should be restored. If you continue to restore your edits without any consensus in favour of it first, you will be blocked from editing. Also by the way, the onus is on you to include a reliable source for your edits, since your edits were reverted on the basis of "no source", and indeed I don't see any sources for your edits. See WP:Verifiability. AP 499D25 (talk) 00:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC) edited 07:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute between User:Mnnie053 and User:Pichsambath, removal of sourced content, possible biting of a newcomer. Thank you. AP 499D25 (talk) 11:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Mnnie053 (talk) 11:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Untamed1910. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Football Federation of Cambodia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It falls on you to provide an reliable for Football Federation of Cambodia, if content was added with out reliable sources, then it is unsourced. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

7 day partial block

I have blocked you from editing articles for 7 days. I encourage you to use this time to post on talk pages to develop consensus. PhilKnight (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ព្រះថោងនាងនាគ.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:ព្រះថោងនាងនាគ.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Gend07000. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sbai, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sbai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Sbai did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!

Picture caption at Sbai

Could you please explain why you describe the person as Cambodian despite the description of the photo in Commons and the original source where it was from? If you would prefer the subject of the photo be Cambodian, I am sure you can find another source that actually depicts a Cambodian lady. Aithus (talk) 02:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of my edit at Krama

I have no opinion about your removal of the statement supported by thaipbsworld source, but the statement you added in its place is not supported by your cited source. The source said the silk pattern is Cambodian-influenced, but said nothing about the garment or its relation to krama. Could you please reword the statement or find an actual source? Aithus (talk) 02:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:ព្រះថោងនាងនាគ.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:ព្រះថោងនាងនាគ.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cambodia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Your recent editing history at Songkran shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Songkran) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Songkran) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are expected to resolve your disagreements with other editors through discussion, not reversions, and given that you've been blocked for this before you really should know that by now. If you want to keep please reach a consensus through discussion with other editors involved. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]