User talk:Pospeak

Welcome!

Hello, Pospeak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Darwinek (talk) 15:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juraj Križko

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Juraj Križko. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pospeak! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 389 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Juraj Križko - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Thanks for contributing the new article Milan Lutonský. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Giant Snowman 15:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michal Škoda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FK Bohemians Praha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Václav Hladký

The article Václav Hladký has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohamed Traoré (French footballer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohamed Traoré (French footballer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for your new article on Czech football! C 679 22:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Muamer Avdič, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Torreslfchero (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Malík, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jiří Janoščin

The article Jiří Janoščin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ludevít Grmela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TJ Gottwaldov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerdatabase.eu

This website violates copyright, so please do not include links to it in the future as you have done at Ludevít Grmela. Regards, Giant Snowman 13:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to FC Zbrojovka Brno may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Fs player | no= — | nat= CZE | name= [[David Farmačka]]|pos=MF}}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vlastimil Veselý

The article Vlastimil Veselý has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully professional league and doesn't meet the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miroslav Keresteš

The article Miroslav Keresteš has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully professional league and doesn't meet the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tadeáš Zezula

The article Tadeáš Zezula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully professional league and doesn't meet the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brno footballers

Hi Pospeak and thanks for your contributions to new articles. I have proposed some of these for deletion, however, as footballers who have not played in the top two Czech leagues, or the top one Slovak league, are not eligible unless they have received significant coverage in the media. Thanks, C 679 07:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Miroslav Keresteš. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Tadeáš Zezula. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to FC Zbrojovka Brno may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

24-lety-zaloznik-Sisler-naopak-do-Sokolova-miri-Glaser-1471 |date=22 February 2014 }}</ref> }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miroslav Keresteš for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miroslav Keresteš is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Keresteš until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brno reserve players

Hello. I see you have restored the Brno reserve players at FC Zbrojovka Brno. Could you please explain why you think this list should be included? None of the players are notable and the reserve team players can not play for the club's A-team. If I don't hear from you, I will revert your changes. Thanks, C 679 17:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, many professional football teams have reserve team squad included in Wiki page (e.g. AC Sparta Prague and SK Slavia Prague in Czech First League). Why I cann't do it by FC Zbrojovka Brno? In addition to this, reserve team players in the Czech Repullic can appear in A-team whenever during the season, so it's probable that any of them do it. Thanks, Pospeak

Nomination of Jiří Janoščin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jiří Janoščin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiří Janoščin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C 679 13:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mihailo Jovanović (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Mihailo Jovanović (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ubiquity (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted because it is likely unnecessary (see WP:TWODABS). I have edited the hatnotes on each page to point directly at the other article. larryv (talk) 20:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petr Rybička

The article Petr Rybička has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY as he hasn't made an appearance in a full professional league or full international match. Also fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yellow Dingo (talk) 13:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tomáš Weber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jablonec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ladislav Krejčí (footballer, born 1999), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pospeak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pospeak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please add reliable sources to Oleh Kvych, an unreferenced biography of a living person. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued to edit - can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page refering to Oleh Kvych was edited by adding 2 sources. Pospeak 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pospeak. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Šustr moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pavel Šustr, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 11:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jiří Floder

Hello, Pospeak,

Thanks for creating Jiří Floder! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Biographies of living people need inline citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 11:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt is the best reliable source in terms of players`s stats. Especially in the area of Czech football, where e.g. Transfermarkt is the only website that takes relegation play-offs into consideration. I don't care if it is user-edited or not. Every website is edited by someone. I've been editing articles about Czech football players for many years and I've never had a problem with Transfermarkt. Pospeak (talk) 16:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:SPS, user-edited sources such as Transfermarkt are not considered reliable and should not be cited in articles. Please do not cite the website again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pavel Šustr

Hello, Pospeak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pavel Šustr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 FC Zbrojovka Brno season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jhon Mosquera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 FC Zbrojovka Brno season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Senec.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claude Lhotecký for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claude Lhotecký is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude Lhotecký until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FromCzech (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miroslav Kamenský for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miroslav Kamenský is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Kamenský until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FromCzech (talk) 16:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vojtěch Šmid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vojtěch Šmid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vojtěch Šmid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FromCzech (talk) 17:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FC Zbrojovka Brno B for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FC Zbrojovka Brno B is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Zbrojovka Brno B until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FromCzech (talk) 12:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FC Zbrojovka Brno HAS PLAYED Czech Second League between 2003-2006. So please STOP deleting this page! Pospeak (talk) 11:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oldřich Pragr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oldřich Pragr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oldřich Pragr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicolas Martinek

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicolas Martinek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FromCzech (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There were added references and external links (Soccerway) to this newly created page. Slovak 2. liga is professional league and 70 games, that Nicolas Martinek has played, is definately notable. I refuse deleting this page. Thanks Pospeak (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that as it stands, the page still does not meet the WP:GNG criteria and could be deleted. That 70 matches in the second Slovak league is a very subjective criterion. In the future please ensure that objective criteria of notability are taken into account when creating a page of a player. It is counterproductive to create a page as soon as a footballer becomes a player of your favorite club. FromCzech (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I read WP:GNG rules over and over again and guess which of the points are not met. Please name one. 70 matches is not enough? How many appearances would be enough? 300? 1000? Who decides on this? So please stop torpedoing my work like you have done in the past with players like Claude Lhotecký, Vojtěch Šmid, Oldřich Pragr and others, where all od them had at least one appearance in Czech Football League. I can look for similar cases like these on Wiki and I'm sure there are dozens and no one needs to delete them. (e.g. Adam Pudil who has 26 appearances only in Czech 2. Liga)...Howgh Pospeak (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following the WP:NSPORTS2022 global RfC, all the participation-based criteria were eliminated and the only thing that matters is GNG criteria. None of the footballers you mentioned was covered enough by media, or at least no one including you was able to prove it, and it's nothing personal against you. Feel free to nominate other players for deletion if you know of any. FromCzech (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I ask again, how many appearances does a player have to have to be significant (to rule GNG criteria)? Give a number. What is "media coverage"? I ask specific questions and unfortunately I only get subjective answers. All of the players mentioned above had external links to official team page, very cited football website Soccerway and referencies from local media. If there is something of it missing, it's not problem to point it out and anyone can add sources to improve reliability. But you nominate it straingh for deletion... To the last one: Don't worry, I'm not going to finger anyone, but in French football, for example, there are a lot of players whose maximum is playing Championnat National 2 (fourth level). Pospeak (talk) 12:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I already wrote, the appearances criterion was abolished. An entry in a database such as Soccerway does not count as media. I nominated it for deletion because at the time the article had no references and nothing to prove his notability (as we already said, the 70 matches alone are not enough). At the moment, there is only one reference, which is at least a record from the media, but it is also not clear from the article what makes the player important (the fact that he became a Zbrojovka player does not make him notable. Nothing about his career is evident from the article, he does not even have a history in youth national teams...). As for your example: I don't know much about French football, but I assume most were created before NSPORTS2022, just like your pages. FromCzech (talk) 13:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me, what EXACTLY should player do to be important or to have media coverage? Is there any measure? For sure there's none, it's all about (your) subjectivity. Pages of Claude Lhotecký, Vojtěch Šmid, Oldřich Pragr were created before 2022 (between 2020-2021), so why did you nominate it for deletion? Noticing that there is lack of sources would be enough... Soccerway database is widely used as a resource of appearances and goals across the world and you don't count it as a reliable source? Pospeak (talk) 11:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a journalist, I don't decide who appears on TV, in newspaper articles etc. But the better clubs and competitions a player plays in and the longer he plays in them, the more he appears in the media. NSPORT2022 is applied to all articles regardless of the time of their creation. It prevents the creation of new pages that do not meet the criteria and it is a base to delete all unimportant players created earlier. Wiki is an encyclopedia, not a database.

Nothing is about my subjectivity, the deletion of each proposal was accompanied by discussions in which a consensus was reached. Look for example on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oldřich Pragr. I didn't even nominate him. Noticing that there is lack of sources is fine when the sources exist, just are not used, not when there aren't any.

Soccerway is a reliable source, but it is a database (and therefore contains all players regardless of their importance) and is therefore not counted among the media. FromCzech (talk) 12:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't have an answer to the question of what media and how often does a player have to be in order to be notable? If you can't answer that for me, subjective evaluation has to come in... How can you say that there were no references in the deleted pages? How did you know that there exist no references? Did you search the internet?

If NSPORT2022 (a huge stupidity in my opinion) applies retroactively, it means deleting thousands to tens of thousands of entries and trampling on the work of a lot of encyclopedists who do it in their spare time. I think it's better to put your efforts in another direction... Pospeak (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jiří Hamza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jiří Hamza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiří Hamza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FromCzech (talk) 14:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hi, this is the third time you added a red link to Adam Kronus in FC Zbrojovka Brno within 12 days. Your actions, in combination with the complete non-use of the edit summary for communication and ignoring what I wrote in my edit summaries, is clearly edit warring. Please start behaving appropriately. FromCzech (talk) 12:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny when you delete the red link before I can create the page. I managed to do it now and the page was created including the references. Calm down... Pospeak (talk) 12:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First you have to create the page, then you can add the link. This is no excuse for not filling out the edit summary or edit warring. FromCzech (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since I find your criticism pointless, you forced me to search the Wiki rules. So according WP:WRITEITFIRST: "...If such an entry links to an article that does not exist, the result is a red link like this one. When the editor goes on to create the new article, the red link in the list turns blue, and assuming the article follows Wikipedia's practices (such as notability, verifiability, and other relevant policies and guidelines), everything is fine. End of citation. Can you tell me something about it? It took me a few minutes to create the article, which wouldn't be a problem if you didn't need to delete something right away.

Pospeak (talk) 13:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just put it in parentheses as a BTW so I don't understand you now. You are not responding in any way to what I wrote in this discussion. And just by the way, you already started his page, but did you really prove his notability? I don't think so. Looks like another example of WP:TOOEARLY. Why don't you wait a few seasons to see if he became notable footballer or not? FromCzech (talk) 13:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't understand you. I added the red link and before I could create the page you had nothing better to do than point out the red link. Which is weird, but it says a lot about your work. We have different views on who is notable, but I am convinced that a start in the most watched sports competition in the world is definitely notable Pospeak (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added the link on 4 August and on 15 August, but you only started the page today. 12 days is a long time, and as I wrote, you don't need a link to create a page, so that's a lame excuse. You are also generally known for linking not-notable footballers and starting their pages, as evidenced by the list of those that were deleted by consensus, so I had every right to delete the link. Also, and sorry to repeat myself, you didn't bother to communicate via Edit summary and instead wanted to edit warring. Think about it before you start making personal attacks.

Btw 5 minutes in Champions League is not success that would make you notable per WP:SPORTBASIC. It's not that your view of notability differs from mine; the point is that your view and the Wiki community's view are different. FromCzech (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No edit war would be needed if you didn't need to attack the red link I created. BTW, on June 9, 2023, user "Rest in pieces" made a change to the head coach of Zbrojovka Luděk Klusáček and added a red link to him. Since no one has made his page yet (a chance for you), the red link has been lit for 2 months. And no one (including me and you) cares. What about the other thousands of red links that are created in different areas, but the articles don't exist yet. Should I take it personally? Why are you starting an edit war only against me? You probably don't watch much football, otherwise you wouldn't be able to write such nonsense about starting in the Champions League. Pospeak (talk) 06:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 FC Zbrojovka Brno season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tomáš Svoboda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 FC Zbrojovka Brno season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Vaněček.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jiří Hamza

Hello, Pospeak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jiří Hamza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FC Zbrojovka Brno B

Hello, Pospeak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FC Zbrojovka Brno B, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristoffer Jørgensen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristoffer Jørgensen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristoffer Jørgensen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FromCzech (talk) 07:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Renards Rimovičs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Renards Rimovičs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FromCzech (talk) 04:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renards Rimovičs moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Renards Rimovičs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ota Kohoutek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ota Kohoutek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ota Kohoutek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FromCzech (talk) 05:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kristoffer Jørgensen

Hello, Pospeak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kristoffer Jørgensen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jiří Hamza (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Demt1298 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. Please find secondary sources that are written about the subject of the article to resubmit for consideration. Demt1298 (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jiří Hamza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Demt1298 (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]