User talk:Prohibited Area

Prohibited Area, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Prohibited Area! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the War in Donbass page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 02:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

three villages

the Pro-Government source clearly states that the YPG has asked Jabha Al-Shamiyah to evacuate the villages of Ibina,Anab,Maryamayn,which indictaes that Jabha Shamiyah controls them,can you please self-revert.Alhanuty (talk) 19:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

apologies, after studying the source I initially failed to find the relevant information. I have self-reverted. However how accurate is this source? The presence of rebel forces non-aligned with the YPG within the Afrin Canton appears suspicious to me. Pro-YPG maps, such as Cizire Canton, would refute this. CC today reported that Nusra launched an attack on YPG forces in Maryamayn which would contradict the pro-SAA source: https://twitter.com/CizireCanton/status/627086203599388672.Prohibited Area (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

a newspaper is more reliable than a twitter source,but the clashes happened there.Alhanuty (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest edit on the Syria war map

… was based on copying this map and was reverted. If you read the comments to the map, you will see that Leith Abou Fadel (editor of Al-Masdar) and another user are telling the map maker that Jubb Al Ahmar is gov-held. Therefore, it is likely that our map was correct and you made it wrong by copying from an online map. Please do not copy from online maps anymore. Banak: this is an example of what I was telling you about… Tradedia^talk 04:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tradedia I just was about to update the .png map, should I hold off on this for the minute? Banak (talk) 04:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Banak: I think you can go ahead with the update if you like. Tradedia^talk 05:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tradedia Apologies.Prohibited Area (talk) 13:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tall SyriaTel

Hi! There where earlier articles from AL-Masdar about the capture of Tall SyriaTel. Thats why the article you referred to as "(Rohanny source doesn't mention capture of Tall SyriaTel, instead I have indicated SAA presence)" where not clear on the matter. The article before that one was however clear: here

"Meanwhile, the SAA’s 67th Brigade has steadily advanced in west Palmyra, despite ISIS’ repeated attempts to reverse their gains at the groves of Al-Bayarat; this usually works against the terrorist group, as the Syrian Armed Forces capitalized on their failures by taking full control of Tal SyriaTel."

Please self-revert your three latest edit as I´m only entitled to revert one of them and in that case it will only look messy. Rhocagil (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I will amend edits using provided sourceProhibited Area (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sinai insurgency map created

I've created this Sinai insurgency map module. I've also added an initial information on it, so you can mark the map by searching internet sources (cities, presence, bases, etc.). Thank you! :) --SMB99thx XD 11:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SMB99thx OK thank you, I will look into it. I am just finishing off the Afghan template in the coming days which has preoccupied me recently.Prohibited Area (talk) 12:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Khatuniyah

I think we edited Al-Khatuniyah to yellow at the same time and now it´s stuck "black" !!!? Rhocagil (talk) 16:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rhocagil (talk) Sometimes the map lags during edits plus I have noticed there are like 4 Khatuniyah towns on the map so idk which is the correct one to edit. When the map catches up to the edits we should be able to see which one we were meant to have edited yellow.Prohibited Area (talk) 16:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well your edit is the same as mine, anyway now it´s yellow on the map.Rhocagil (talk) 16:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

121st Artillery Regiment near Hasakah

SDF also retake the village Khama'il and 121st Artillery Regiment near the city Hasakah.source source 37.52.28.53 (talk) 19:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

37.52.28.53 (talk) Thank you, I would say the Facebook source isn't reliable enough to be used as an edit however the other source more so. However given it is in Arabic and the automatic translation doesn't mention the capture of Al Kham'il, instead it references villages 'Qana', and 'Dignity'. Can you confirm that the source specifically mentions YPG (or SDF) have captured Al Kham'il?Prohibited Area (talk) 20:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SCW & ISIL general sanctions notification

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR

You said that articles from SOHR on English unreliable but why? I'm not going to challenge this fact, I just want to know why, because I thought that between articles of SOHR on Arabic and English there is no difference. I would be grateful for an explanation. Sûriyeya (talk) 18:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR English sometimes is inaccurate because of poor Arabic-Engish translation. I suspect the source you provided was a case of this and rather that it meant to specify clashes in the Ain Issa countryside. If Ain Issa was contested there would be much more information on the clashes, such as YPG statements as well as ISIS propaganda etc. However since this isn't present it should be assumed that the SOHR source was poorly worded and therefore its inaccuracy should be omitted from the map.Prohibited Area (talk) 19:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Bruskom ^{talk to me} 19:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JaT

I´m not talking about JaT (Jaysh al-Thuwar). I´m talking about Thuwwar al-Raqqa witch is a big difference. Anyway you you understood what point i was arguing. Rhocagil (talk) 01:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liwa Thuwwar al-Raqqa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Prohibited Area. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 10:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 10:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

137th Armoured Brigade

Firstly you use biased anti SAA source which can't be used against SAA and secondly artcile was deleted(for now it is written: "Sorry, the page you were looking for was not found")here So you need do self-revert you edit. Sûriyeya (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source is definitely more favourable of the SAA than ISIS. Also Al-Masdar has just confirmed the offensive.Prohibited Area (talk) 18:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Prohibited Area. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]