User talk:RedHillian
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Mauritius edit
[edit]changes - don't forget - sometimes anon IPs remove vandalism. ;-) Wongm (talk)
- I'll fully hold my hands up to getting that wrong - I over clicked using huggle, and in the attempt to undo what I'd done I managed to crash the programme & my browser, by the time I'd got back to where I was, I couldn't find it! --RedHillian | Talk 00:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Stagecraft Newsletter
[edit]| The WikiProject Stagecraft Newsletter (October 2010) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Stagecraft at 13:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC).
deposit
[edit]Your explanation was excellent, but I wikified Deposit (politics) as I'm concerned about every MP candidate affected having to repeat that explanation which imo isn't necessary except for those (who shall remain nameless) who are from a different country and political system. ;-) That's what hyperlinks are for. You could also add a footnote referencing the Guardian report which explained it. 75.59.204.135 (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I don't plan to change any other articles, but if you check the history for that article, someone decided that it needed clarification, so I added it. --RedHillian | Talk 00:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Unhelpful?
[edit]Why did you mark this as unhelpful and mark it as resolved? Ryan Vesey 19:27, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, considering your summary, I would find it resolved for the most part, but not unhelpful. Consider, this. I have no reason to believe it is PD, but it wouldn't be impossible to find an image like those that the person stated, so I'd say his comment was helpful. Ryan Vesey 19:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- That view looks very familiar - I think that picture was actually taken in the Greenwich foot tunnel, near the repaired / reinforced section mentioned in that article rather than in the Tower Subway. The Tower Subway contains water mains & communication cables, none of which are visible which also suggests to me it's not actually the location mentioned in the accompanying blogpost. I'd concede that it's not impossible that at some point a suitably illustrative and license-free image will appear of the tunnel interior as it is today (although , but I strongly suspect that if there were an image contemporary with the construction, it would be far more widely seen in the various articles online. The other part of the feedback requests an image that is already in the article. I didn't feel this was helpful, but if maintaining a 100% approval rating on a suggestion is that important I can remove my "unhelpful" flag. --RedHillian | Talk 00:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to the first Brighton Wiki Meetup which will take place at The West Quay, Brighton Marina Village, Brighton BN2 5UT on Sunday 28 April 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Brighton topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Uh, what? Well, thanks but seeing how I live over 250 miles from there... --RedHillian | Talk 14:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
The article Maelstrom (live role playing game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —me_and 14:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Metrolink photos
[edit]Thanks RedHillian (Talk:Oldham King Street Metrolink station). Any chance you could do one of the new Salford Crescent station too? Crookesmoor (talk) 08:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'll look into doing that, see when I've got a spare day to pop down there as well. --RedHillian | Talk 18:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Noted, thank you. --RedHillian | Talk 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, RedHillian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Noted, thank you.--RedHillian | Talk
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RedHillian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, RedHillian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Duly noted--RedHillian | Talk 02:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Duly noted --RedHillian | Talk 19:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Duly noted. --RedHillian | Talk 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Duly noted. --RedHillian | Talk 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Duly noted.--RedHillian | Talk 00:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
