User talk:Ridzaina

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page BabyRiki, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bon Om Touk

added links pointing to Creek, Bas and Devas

Wish Upon a Star

added links pointing to Glamour and First hand

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bon Om Touk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bas and Devas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== Quo

Naomi Emmanuel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Naomi Emmanuel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naomi Emmanuel (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

Fails WP:NACTOR. Moved back to draft space. If moved to main space without substantive improvement it risks deletion

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naomi Emmanuel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Naomi Emmanuel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ridzaina! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Emmanuel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Naomi Emmanuel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to assume edit conflict over the second version appearing in main space. BOTH versions are now in Draft: You need to choose which one you will progress 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Naomi Emmanuel 2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Naomi Emmanuel 2. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naomi Emmanuel 2 (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Fails WP:NACTOR. Moved back to draft space. If moved to main space without substantive improvement it risks deletion

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naomi Emmanuel 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Naomi Emmanuel 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Thank you for contributing to the article Draft:Naomi Emmanuel. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 23:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop using "opera.news" as you did at Tonia Okoro Ferrari. Each byline notes the author is a "self media writer", and there is a large disclaimer at the bottom of each page stating "Opera News is a free to use platform and the views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent, reflect or express the views of Opera News. Any/all written content and images displayed are provided by the blogger/author, appear herein as submitted by the blogger/author and are unedited by Opera News." This is not, in any way, a WP:RS. Using it to support personal material on biographies is an extremely bad idea. Kuru (talk) 11:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment Kuru Ridzaina (talk) 11:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bimbo Ademoye

added a link pointing to Best Actress in a Supporting Role

Hadiza Aliyu

added a link pointing to Gabonese

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi - FYI I have reverted your recent edits, for the following reasons:

Please see WP:OVERLINK - there is no need to link to pages like "actor", "actress", "film" etc
Please take greater care when categorising:
- See WP:Container category - categories like "Nigerian men" or "Nigerian people" should never be added to actual pages.
- There is also no need to add categories like "Nigerian men" if the page is already a member of categories like "Nigerian male actors", its redundant
- I'm not too sure why you would add Category:Nigerian men by occupation to any pages - that is another container cat for occupation categories
- You've also added Category:Living people to pages of persons who are deceased, please be careful

Thanks Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 03:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a final warning, Ridzaina. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding stubs manually to categories

Hi Ridzaina, I have just had to revert dozens of your edits made over the last couple of days because you added stub categories manually. Stub categories should only be added by templates, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. But another problem is that in almost all of the edits where you maunally added the stub as a category, the stub template was already included prior to your edit, so there was no need to add the stub a second time. Going forward, can you please add stubs by template, and make sure that the stub isn't already in the article before adding. It just makes work for other editors who have to cleanup. Like I said, I already fixed alot of the edits, so there's nothing to do with those articles, but if you were doing this before I cut off fixing them, then it's posible there's more i didn't get too. Cmr08 (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bimbo Ademoye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Actress in a Supporting Role.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kabiri Fubara moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kabiri Fubara, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuwaya — The Haunted Village moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ajuwaya — The Haunted Village, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajuwaya — The Haunted Village (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I returned this to draft because I am not persuaded that it passes WP:NFILM

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajuwaya — The Haunted Village and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tonia Okoro Ferrari moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tonia Okoro Ferrari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clinic Matters

Hello, Ridzaina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clinic Matters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naomi Emmanuel

Hello, Ridzaina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naomi Emmanuel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naomi Emmanuel 2

Hello, Ridzaina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naomi Emmanuel 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kabiri Fubara

Hello, Ridzaina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kabiri Fubara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Clinic Matters

Hello, Ridzaina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clinic Matters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naomi Emmanuel

Hello, Ridzaina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naomi Emmanuel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naomi Emmanuel 2

Hello, Ridzaina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naomi Emmanuel 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kabiri Fubara

Hello, Ridzaina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kabiri Fubara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tonia Okoro Ferrari

Hello, Ridzaina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tonia Okoro Ferrari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olaitan has been accepted

Olaitan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nagol0929 (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ajuwaya — The Haunted Village

Hello, Ridzaina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ajuwaya — The Haunted Village".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Abdulquawiy Abdulganiyu Olododo

Hello Ridzaina, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Abdulquawiy Abdulganiyu Olododo, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulquawiy Abdulganiyu Olododo.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]