User talk:Rkarlsba

If you are Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk as indicated by your user name and as published here [1], the internal links you are adding to CallWeaver at YATE, FreePBX and Asterisk (PBX) is considered a form of spamming WP:COI#How to avoid COI edits. I suggest you remove them and submit them to the articles' talk page for another WP editor to add. You should also identify yourself as a member of the CallWeaver development team. Calltech 18:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Opera Dragonfly

A tag has been placed on Opera Dragonfly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lil labour day award

		The Original Barnstar
		keep on contributing like you did for the labour day article, keep up the good work Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I♥cabbages

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as I♥cabbages, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Polargeo (talk) 06:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I♥cabbages

A tag has been placed on I♥cabbages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 06:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota model listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Minnesota model. Since you had some involvement with the Minnesota model redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JDOG555 (talk) 17:45, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BC

I changed it because Āryabaṭha was born in 476 AD - not BC. You made it incorrect. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kogalymavia Flight 9268

Hi there and thanks for your contributions. You may need to look at WP:SYNTH and WP:IRS to see why your addition keeps getting removed. Basically we would need a good source that explicitly makes the connection between the supposed SAM capability and the recent crash. Please don't add material which merely asserts that they have this capability, and especially please do not back it upi with really poor sources. On the article talk page, it is better to state your suggestions of added content, with the sources you wish to use, and see what others think, than to fulminate about censorship. I was one of the people who removed it, and I did so because (as added) it failed our inclusion criteria. We are famously not censored, but that does not mean you can stitch two unrelated things, one sourced to websites that are basically blogs, then put your synthesis onto an article. Make sense? --John (talk) 21:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rkarlsba. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huawei Honor

On behalf of Huawei, I've proposed an expanded Huawei Honor article, which I see you originally created. You can view my edit request on the article's talk page. I’m trying to find a neutral editor to copy over the proposed draft as appropriate. Might you be able to help? Inkian Jason (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tsjad listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tsjad. Since you had some involvement with the Tsjad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 17:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rkarlsba. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Swappiness

An article that you have been involved in editing—Swappiness—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Rinaku (t · c) 15:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rkarlsba. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]