User talk:SamuelLovesFilms

Welcome!

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! paul2520 💬 01:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Toronto Film Critics Association Awards 2020 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Toronto Film Critics Association Awards 2020, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 14:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Skingo12. I noticed that in this edit to Seattle Film Critics Society, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skingo12 (talk) 09:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SamuelLovesFilms, in response to the message at my talk page yes it is completely ok to merge and split. However it is really important to let other editors know what you are doing with the edit description. Also for inexperienced editors it is sometimes best to start a discussion on the talk page, however this is not always necessary. Skingo12 (talk) 10:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 48th Annie Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:SFCS Awards.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SFCS Awards.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:SFCS Awards.png

Thanks for uploading File:SFCS Awards.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Cinematography moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Cinematography, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Foreign Language Film moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Foreign Language Film, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Picture moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Picture, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

versacespace talk to me 02:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! versacespace talk to me 02:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Action Choreography (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Action Choreography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Action Choreography, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 17:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Screenplay (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Screenplay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Screenplay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Foreign Language Film (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Foreign Language Film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Foreign Language Film, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Cinematography (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Cinematography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Cinematography, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Picture (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Picture and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Picture, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actress (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actress and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actress, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Austin Film Critics Association Award for Best Film Editing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 19:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All current sources are from the subject itself. We need independent sources to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbrks (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources are independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbrks (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Cal Brunker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cal Brunker.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Cal Brunker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cal Brunker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 13:59, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PAW Patrol: The Movie. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Either remove any unsourced material or cite with reliable entries.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge on the Run, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice!

- SamuelLovesFilms 16:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC) SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 08:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ordering

I made a post here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:PAW_Patrol:_The_Movie#Ordering_characters What do you think of changing the order to reflect the characters' "prominence in the film" like WP:MOSTV says to do? FunhausFrank (talk) 13:40, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 PBA season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alaska Aces.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DFCC Awards Chron

Template:DFCC Awards Chron has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 2pou (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Picture

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Picture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actress, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actress

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actress, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Action Choreography

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Action Choreography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Screenplay

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Screenplay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Foreign Language Film

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Foreign Language Film, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Cinematography

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Cinematography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Template:Hollywood Critics Association

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Hollywood Critics Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Hollywood Critics Association

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Hollywood Critics Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Actor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PAW Patrol: The Movie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seattle Film Critics Society Award for Best Supporting Actor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song

Hello, SamuelLovesFilms. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Song, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PAW Patrol The Mighty Movie logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PAW Patrol The Mighty Movie logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 03:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:

I would recommend waiting until the film is closer towards release, per WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PAW Patrol: The Mighty Movie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion for CAA

Thanks for helping me out about Crunchyroll Anime Awards after I found something in your revision that you made "Most wins", which all of the lists are corrected before it was removed by someone. So, I decided to added awards and nominations for Crunchyroll, including yours that I copied into the main page back. Also, can you add more than five nominations? (Not less than five like four or two.) Fortunewriter (talk) 06:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:BokunoHīrōAkademiakeyvisual.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BokunoHīrōAkademiakeyvisual.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added the licensing tag. Is it good now? SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 13:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from My Hero Academia into List of My Hero Academia episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

My Hero Academia (season 1)

added a link pointing to Yuki Hayashi

My Hero Academia (season 2)

added a link pointing to Yuki Hayashi

My Hero Academia (season 3)

added a link pointing to Yuki Hayashi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done editing. Sorry for my mistakes that I didn't realized at first. I will keep in check next time, before I publish the edit. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of preemptive archive links

Hi! I saw that you recently removed a bunch of archive links from refs at Cartoon Saloon, I'm guessing because the links were not dead. So, I want to inform you that preemptive archiving is actually encouraged to prevent future dead links (see WP:DEADREF), which is why I would like to ask you to stop removing archive links in the future, whether the original link is dead or not. Thank you! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 02:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As an editor, I apologize for what I did. I couldn't realize about the removal links in the first place. I will keep that in mind next time, so there wouldn't have any issues or concerns again. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 11:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Quaemenelimbus. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Haikyu!! episodes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Quaemenelimbus (🗨 here) ^_^ 15:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Hero Academia Season 6

It seems my original understanding of your edit was incorrect. You added a parts section simply because the season have 2 cours? Yeah, that's definitely NOT how we do things here. For it to be a part, it has to be officially stated as such by official sources, and even at that usually its because it's considered a "split-cour", which this season is not as it should be airing for 6 consecutive months from October to March. Thank you for reading. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 03:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks for that reminder! I'll take that from now. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 03:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SamuelLovesFilms: No problems, at first I thought you believed this was a split-cour season hence the original revision statement. But when it comes to anime series, listing every season that has more than one consecutive seasonal cour as a part isn't really something we do unless the official sources of the anime series consider it a part themselves, like Attack on Titan has done with Seasons 3 & 4.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 04:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Clover, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Access dates

Please update access dates when you reuse a source, as you didn't here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shang-Chi_and_the_Legend_of_the_Ten_Rings&diff=1141529492&oldid=1141409343. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 14:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crunchyroll's Jujutsu Kaisen 0

I tried adding two other winners from the Crunchyroll awards in regards to the film Jujutsu Kaisen 0 (film) but I messed up the table. Could you give it a look? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Xexerss already did it. But don't worry, the user can make the articles credible and improve as well which is important. Thanks for noticing me anyways! SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vikingskool

I am working on Draft:Vikingskool and wondering if you would want to help Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 08:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Tensei Iida

Hello SamuelLovesFilms. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tensei Iida, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Technically speaking, following MOS:JAPAN, the romanization of "飯田" (hiragana:いいだ) as Iida is correct. If the English language sources cite Ida instead of Iida, then that would be fine. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Titan (season 4)

Sorry for the lack of citation. Obviously since this just got announced there is no reliable source yet in English but when Anime News Network provides one please add it to the lead sentences in the List of and Season 4 articles if you can for me. Thanks. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. No problem about it! SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 11:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how to delete an image, or how to nominate the deletion of an image?

The image in question is this old teaser visual that is now redundant. Thank you. - Theodorethebear (talk) 12:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you add a code from the file image as follows: ffd|log=2023 September 14|help=off, with both side ends have a bracket ({{ }}) symbol. Then maybe go to the files for discussion page and add something to say about the image in the "Recent nominations" section under the current date. If my instructions didn't work out, then ask someone else. Thank you. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 12:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. They told me it will be deleted automatically for being unused a bit later. - Theodorethebear (talk) 15:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Global TV Demand Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Global TV Demand Awards, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Global TV Demand Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Wanted to say thanks for your edit to the article "Shinzo wo Sasageyo!" I didn't know what to call the "Awards" section since the song didn't actually win anything, and "Accolades" works great! Cheers, Johnson524 15:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One-For-All!!!

		The Anime and Manga BarnSakura
		Thank you for editing the MHA page!! Enjoy this special Barnstar Babysharkboss2 was here!! 19:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to say

The date is different because I am in different time zone. I am living in Aus/NZ right now so it was already the 15th of October, while I think you were still in the 14th. Theodorethebear (talk) 02:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that. I think I now see why the edit of yours is different than mine. But I'm only there to change it for the date of news that website published and the access date that the reference was added earlier which yeah, for mine it wasn't October 15th until 8am. Regardless, I acknowledged your point about my edit in Spy × Family second season article. Thank you. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 04:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Social Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding MOS:ORDINAL

Hi. I've noticed that in several articles you have changed the ordinals greater than nine from numerals to words. It's not that it bothers me in particular, but MOS:ORDINAL states: "generally, for single-digit ordinals write first through ninth, not 1st through 9th." The MOS doesn't prohibit the use of numerals for figures of two digits or more (i.e. starting at 10). As I say, I don't think your corrections are wrong, but I wanted to clarify that leaving them expressed in numerals is not incorrect either. Xexerss (talk) 05:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I have seen the notable articles did the same thing about the two digit numerals, which is why I wanted to change it to make the text information precisely. Is that what many articles didn't require that type of guideline in the first place? SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 05:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Perhaps it's simply a matter of habit that two-digit ordinals are expressed in words in several other articles instead of numerals. I just wanted to point out that, while it may not be the "usual" thing to do, the MOS doesn't even imply that the other way is incorrect. Not really the big deal anyway, and I'm fine with either option, I just wanted you to take it into consideration for the next time. Cheers. Xexerss (talk) 06:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for making me understand. Cheers. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 06:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JP native episode titles

If an anonymous user by the address 104.1.182.97 adds the episode titles as they have done on Spy × Family (season 2), feel free to revert / remove them. They've gotten every single JP native title wrong on nearly all of their edits and they cannot be trusted to add correct info, which qualifies as WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll considered it. I'm keeping an eye anytime which confused us, given by the anonymous user nowadays. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 05:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of category

Hey, just so you know, I've tagged this category for deletion, as the account named in the category wasn't the sockmaster. Please let me know if you think I've made a mistake here, though. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 01:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. I honestly thought the recent user was the one that getting blocked previously, is the real sockpuppet. I understand about it, do your best next time though. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 02:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vinland Saga ANN awards

Hi there. Noted you put the tables in Heavenly Delusion and wondered if you could Vinland Saga from ANN, there and here. I kept trying doing something similar with Jujutsu Kaisen 0 but I always messed up the table. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANN template

Heyo, I've been advised not to trim down the Anime News Network external link template down to only ANN initials as it causes redirecting issues. Going forward please don't do that anymore, it was a mistake on my part when I first started that without truly understanding the technical implications. Thank you. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 07:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source code capitalisations

Hi! I noticed you often capitalise parameters like "{{infobox" to "{{Infobox"，"{{start date" to "{{Start date", etc. Parameters like "| released =" don't work if capitalised as "| Released =". I think it's purely a stylistic choice from the editor's end, but since the ones I mentioned earlier work both ways, wouldn't it be better to keep them in lowercase for consistency? Lunar-akaunto／talk 08:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe just for some of the articles that had a lowercase for any situation whether it's possible or not. But for me, I am responsible for these parameters in which most articles did the exact thing as long as everything needs to be applied for some reason in different ways. SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 10:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. Can you rephrase your answer? Lunar-akaunto／talk 13:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rephrase: Some of the parameters for the articles you mentioned should have a lowercase if possible, but most of them always had to be an uppercase which is why I'm responsible to any of these edits, for example, in Jujutsu Kaisen season 1 (soundtrack). SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 13:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm saying is that those parameters work perfectly fine even without capitalisation, and I see no guide explicitly stating what to capitalise. Honestly, it shouldn't matter since it doesn't obscure the way the information is displayed, and most importantly, achieving this consistency, whether small or capitalised, throughout Wikipedia is not virtually possible. Going forward, do I capitalise them or not when creating new entries? so as to save you from having to fix them. Lunar-akaunto／talk 16:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My Hero Academia season 7

Could you explain how you discovered the weekly episode update information you did that usually launches immediately after an episode finishes broadcasting hours before its official launch? Thank you. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 09:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just found that in the tweet posts on maPPle's Twitter account, you can check out the recent one that I did earlier: https://twitter.com/MappleYellovv/status/1806674056005202125 SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 09:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note: Please don't update the episode count until after said episode actually finishes airing in the season or animanga infoboxes, not 2-3 hours beforehand.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well if that's what you realized what I'm doing previously, I think that's fine if we would stick to that process instead. Sorry for my cause in the past days now, I'll make sure that I'm taking note next time afterwards. Problem solved, huh? SamuelLovesFilms (talk) 10:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Lost Canvas

I managed to expand the creation and reception sections from Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas after gathering some interviews in French and Spanish but I think they need some revisions from an editor more skilled at English than me. I'm not really sure where to keep Teshirogi's comments over the anime since she also wrote some new scenes. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help with the Hunter x Hunter characters. I couldn't find any image with Killua's normal look by Togashi wearing his casual and normal clothes so if you find a similar image more fitting for the infobox feel free to replace it. I had the same problem with Gon as he originally had a digitall colored image from the first chapter while Kurapika's was originally taken from a volume cover and then replaced with the more recognizable featured now. Tintor2 (talk) 20:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]