User talk:StonePeter

Hi StonePeter. Regarding your recent changes of Ciudad Vieja to San Miguel Escobar at the Iximche and Antigua Guatemala pages, San Miguel is a barrio, or district/neighbourhood, of Ciudad Vieja. I don't know how your Spanish is, but you can find confirmation of this at the official website of the municipality of Ciudad Vieja at Datos Generales de Ciudad Vieja Sacatepéquez as well as the confirmation of the early Colonial capital in the San Miguel Escobar district at Historia de Ciudad Vieja . Best regards, and I hope you carry on contributing to the encyclopedia, Simon Burchell (talk) 20:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the deal

I just undid my recent undo of your edit in Soul music. As a return I ask that you put something, anything on your user page. This will change your name from being a red link to being a blue link , which in turn suggests (at least to me) that you plan on being around for a while. Which I hope you do. I like editors with libraries who can add references that are not just perishable links. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 02:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of soul musicians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jimmy Hughes and Frederick Knight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stormy Monday

Hi, thanks for your edits to music articles. When you edit or move an article, it helps to make use of the talk page first, usually to make note of the article class level and to see if any discussion has taken place. This is because many (but not all) articles that reach the level of GA and above have been vetted for accuracy. If you think the page should be moved to a new title, please try to make a note of it on the talk page first to attract discussion. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 02:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eggs Benedict

I posted the following information which was deleted without any inquiry to me, a direct 5th generation descendant of Mrs. Le Grand Benedict:

"During Chef Ranhofer's Delmonico years (1862-1899), Captain and Mrs. Le Grand Benedict (born 1843, Emma Frances Gardner) were frequent diners. Five generations of Benedict family history, include Mabel C. Butler (descended through Mrs. LeGrand Benedict's daughter Florence), who authored a 1967 letter[8] to the New York Times."

and this:

"Oscar Tschirky quite possibly learned of eggs Benedict from Chef Ranhofer during their crossover Delmonico years together. While Lemuel Benedict may indeed have requested the egg concoction from Tschirky at the Waldorf in 1894 as a hangover cure, in that same year, the recipe was already printed in chef Ranhofer's The Epicurean.[9]"

I can elaborate further if you wish.

I respectfully request revision to Wiki's information; to leave 2 questionable origins is a disservice to Wiki readers, particularly with hard evidence by Mabel C. Butler, 1967 New York Times - see page 5 on this link - http://emilybenedictgascoyne.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/mabel-c-butler-new-york-times-page-5_-19671.pdf

and in The Epicurean - https://archive.org/stream/epicureancomplet00ranhrich#page/858/mode/1up

I respectfully request Wiki present all potential origins similar to those as researched by, and reported in, Gourmet http://www.gourmet.com/food/gourmetlive/2011/051111/eggs-benedict-who.html

Ebenedict 5gen (talk) 23:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Ebenedict 5gen[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, StonePeter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, StonePeter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]