User talk:TeddyRoosevelt1912

Welcome

Hello, TeddyRoosevelt1912, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! TeddyRoosevelt1912, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Villages in Pryluky

A tag has been placed on Category:Villages in Pryluky indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, thank you for this information. I agree that it should be deleted, because I created the page with a typo (my apologies). I have immediately created another with the correct title, and placed all the appropriate pages into this new category instead of the old one. Thanks again. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Verkhobuzh

added a link pointing to Zolochiv Raion

Vydra, Ukraine

added a link pointing to Zolochiv Raion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bilka, Sumy Oblast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bilka, Sumy Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Villages in Okhtyrka Raion

A tag has been placed on Category:Villages in Okhtyrka Raion indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Empty categories

Hello, TeddyRoosevelt1912,

There are a lot of categories I believe you created that showed up on tonight's, Empty Categories list. Ordinarily, they would be tagged CSD C1 speedy deletion as empty categories. Do you expect these categories to be empty for long? I'm not going to tag the categories tonight if they will just need to be untagged tomorrow. In general, we discourage editors from mass-creating categories before they are needed just to avoid problems like this. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz，I apologize if these categories have caused much disruption for you, as the creation of many empty categories is simply because it is a part of my editing process, as I find this method more efficient than creating each category separately at different times. I do not expect these categories to remain empty for long, and they will be filled eventually in the next few days (preferably tomorrow if my schedule allows), so there is no need to tag them for deletion. Thank you for notifying me about this, and I will avoid creating many temporarily-empty categories when I edit categories in the future. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 03:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sloviansk Thermal Power Plant moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sloviansk Thermal Power Plant, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pavlivka, Volnovakha Raion moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Pavlivka, Volnovakha Raion. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zelena Dolyna, Synelnykove Raion moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Zelena Dolyna, Synelnykove Raion. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zelena Dolyna (Kramatorsk Raion) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zelena Dolyna (Kramatorsk Raion), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 09:18, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pavlivka, Volnovakha Raion has been accepted

Pavlivka, Volnovakha Raion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Compusolus (talk) 08:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bilka, Sumy Oblast has been accepted

Bilka, Sumy Oblast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Compusolus (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zelena Dolyna (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zelena Dolyna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zelena Dolyna, Donetsk Oblast has been accepted

Zelena Dolyna, Donetsk Oblast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sloviansk Thermal Power Plant has been accepted

Sloviansk Thermal Power Plant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zelena Dolyna

Hello, TeddyRoosevelt1912. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zelena Dolyna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subdivisions of Crimea

You did somethig wrong. Do you continue working on it? - Altenmann >talk 02:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the message. I know it is not quite the right way to craft this template, but I am trying to place both the de facto subdivisions (Russian one up top) with the de jure subdivisions (Ukrainian one at bottom), so that readers may be able to see both simultaneously. If this setup is not acceptable, I can simply create a new page and separate the two. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 13:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is not with two-in-one template. You created a huge empty space with raions in the second table. You have to list them in the same way as in the old template. - Altenmann >talk 17:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's an easy fix, these spaces are reserved for the listing of hromadas that are yet to be decided by the Verkhovna Rada based on a recently-passed law. They are not meant to be permanent, and will be filled in once the hromadas are announced. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought. But now it looks ugly. For now you can temporarily comment out the "empty" groups:

<!-- |group1 = [[Bakhchysarai Raion]] |list1 =

...

|group10 = [[Yalta Raion]] |list10 = --> and copy the group or raions from the upper template. Please keep in mind that numbering of groups does not matter for display. - Altenmann >talk 17:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good way to go about it, I've already done the editing. Thanks! TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TeddyRoosevelt1912. Thank you for your work on Henichesk Bridge. User:ARandomName123, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work on this page!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Please don't add texts with fake references as you added "Original usage" You have two cows. This is a grave disruption of Wikipedia. - Altenmann >talk 20:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TeddyRoosevelt1912. Thank you for your work on Embassy of Russia, Tel Aviv. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I wish the same for you as well! TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of India, Moscow

I reverted your edits to Embassy of India, Moscow because the subject is not notable. We need significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. You didn't provide that. The redirect stays. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same is true for Embassy of Russia, New Delhi. I suggest that you consider notability before you start editing. Per WP:REALPROBLEM, you should make the article the best it can possibly be before you cease editing it. New Page Patrollers like me are not going to wait multiple hours for you to get the job done. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Hungary, Moscow moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Embassy of Hungary, Moscow. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 22:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Embassy of Russia, New Delhi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Russia, New Delhi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Russia, New Delhi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Russia, Pyongyang moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Embassy of Russia, Pyongyang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Embassy of Russia, Pyongyang has been accepted

Embassy of Russia, Pyongyang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Embassy of Hungary, Moscow has been accepted

Embassy of Hungary, Moscow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TeddyRoosevelt1912. Thank you for your work on Embassy of China, Belgrade. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Urban-type settlements in Berdychiv Raion

A tag has been placed on Category:Urban-type settlements in Berdychiv Raion indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Urban-type settlements in Novoukrainka Raion

A tag has been placed on Category:Urban-type settlements in Novoukrainka Raion indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Urban-type settlements by raion in Ukraine

A tag has been placed on Category:Urban-type settlements by raion in Ukraine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update to template transcluded on your userpage

I wish to inform you that as a result of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User hate CCP, one of the userboxes on your user page has been modified. If you are content with this change, you may leave it as-is. If you dislike this change, you may remove the userbox, reword it, or replace it with something else, as long as you do not restore the word "hate" or another word that is likely to be similarly offensive. If you have any questions, you may ask me on my talk page. Best wishes, —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 19:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TeddyRoosevelt1912. Thank you for your work on Tarak Tamga. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article. I had not known about tamgas previously. The images are very interesting. Thanks again.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pripyat (river) map

Hi, I am wandering where did you get the map you added: added wikidata map. - Altenmann >talk 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the map is actually already in the wikidata page, I only added the Template:Infobox mapframe that showed the map. The maps are usually from OpenStreet Map, and you can see an OpenStreetMap relation ID (P402) in the wikidata pages, which is where the map is actually from. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 22:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was asking because the map I saw in "locator map image" in [1]] is just an image. Now, a follow-up question: how did you figure out |zoom=5 |height=250 params? - Altenmann >talk 22:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those params are just for the visual, and are adjustments that I found to be the most natural for those reading, they don't influence the actual data at all TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 22:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are these typical/common values, or one has to adjust them for every map separately? - Altenmann >talk 23:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I typically keep the height the same, but the zoom would have to depend on the length of the river, so that it would be just right on the screen (most commonly between 5-8) TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 23:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need more help : I created Likteņdārzs and found it in OpenStreet. Now, where do I get OpenStreetMap relation ID (P402)? - Altenmann >talk 06:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, once you found the relation ID on OpenStreet, you can just add it onto the wikidata page as a new identifier. Make sure the wikidata code is also linked inside the OpenStreet relation (this requires an account in OpenStreet also), and the map should show soon after you add the template (it could take a couple days for the data to update) TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the monument you created, and I only found ones that were "way" and not "relation", which could still be put on wikidata (OpenStreetMap way ID (P10689), but wouldn't help the Template:Infobox mapframe on the wikipedia page. So, you would have to create a separate relation on OSM just with the object, get the new ID, and then add it onto wikidata and go from there.

This is why I only usually create OpenStreet relations for rivers/canals/roads, because they are really hard to see without the interactive maps; for most singlular locations like monument, I would just add a coordinate, put it on a pushpin map, and call it a day. Of course, it is always up to the editor how to incorporate the maps, so I would be more than happy to help you get the map if it helps you understand how this works. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, pushpin is enough here: the object is well-localized by its geography. Thanks. - Altenmann >talk 16:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

McClellan–Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System

Two of the maps you just added aren't working, and just show blue. I reverted McClellan–Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. You may want to test the others. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for letting me know, these maps are usually ok, and just take some time for the data to update. I've looked into them and fixed them accordingly. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 00:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canal de Provence

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

I've added the attribution in this case, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for letting me know, I was not aware of this before, I will keep this in mind afterwards. However, I looked over to the page history and found your edit, but all I saw was a deleted empty row, neither could I find it within the page, so I'm confused as to what I'm supposed to do going forward? TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 21:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's the edit summary that is important. I did a dummy edit in order to add the edit summary, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also put a tag on the article talk page Atlantic306 (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]