User talk:TheGoodAndHolyLord

This is TheGoodAndHolyLord's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then notify your talk page.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, Thegoodandholylord, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Template:Thegoodandholylord sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – Train2104 (t • c) 02:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial park infobox

I have reverted your change of infobox templates at Killbear Provincial Park. Per the note at the top of template:infobox park, "If the park is a natural protected area listed by IUCN, then editors should use {{Infobox protected area}}." -- Whpq (talk) 20:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Tice

Hi. Was your edit to restore details of his relationship with Oakeshott? Oitchy (talk) 03:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I noticed the edit I undid didn't have an edit summary nor reason to remove information that had been adequately sourced. That edit was meant to revert the deletion of two bits of information at different points in the article. Seeing as Tice's relationship with Isabel Oakeshott was available in more than one article online, I assumed it was true. If you're telling me it never happened, I would be more than happy to discuss this further to remove it from the article. If, however, it happened but now isn't happening, I believe it should stay on the article. Hope this answers your question!

TheGoodAndHolyLord ^{Let's Talk!} 04:05, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reynolds (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Reynolds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	For updating Wikipedia:Press coverage Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're really annoying for declining my requests, BUT you're right

As you saw in the title that is a compliment... Although It's insane that Han Dynasty's a featured topic but not the Roman Empire. 190.218.30.203 (talk) 03:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment! I'm glad we're on the same page now. You're welcome to read WP:DEV and WP:FACR for information on improving article status. If you'd like to improve the Roman Empire article without edit requests, create an account and you'll be able to edit the article after 10 edits and four days.

Regards, TGHL ↗ 03:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for answering my help me request. StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, my pleasure! TG HL ↗ 🍁 15:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for all your help! LMJ050100 (talk) 09:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime, happy to help! TG HL ↗ 🍁 15:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANEW

There is currently a discussion where you are mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DaRmaKinamon93 reported by User:Chipmunkdavis (Result: ). Best, CMD (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Oyombe

sorry if i used many users i dont know where to start or end i kindl repsect your job and humility its just that i find myself in a difficult situation no job to catter for my family due to the article and nothing to do have a blessed day my name is andrew oyombe wikipedia name apachekamumbai — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apachekamumbai (talk • contribs) 09:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Apachekamumbai: I sympathize with you. Apart from finding reliable sources to expand the article with more information, the article could be nominated for deletion as non-notable as a last resort. FYI, multiple accounts, referred to as sockpuppets, are not allowed here – your other accounts may soon be blocked. Thanks, TG HL ↗ 🍁 10:19, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been added to the pending changes reviewer group, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:51, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

I've noticed you on my watchlist a few times reverting vandalism/generally being helpful, so here's a kitten! (Or a maple creme cookie if you're allergic to cats, like I am).

Clovermoss (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Clovermoss, thank you very much! Cookie was delicious. 😁 TG HL ↗ 🍁 21:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hej

i hope you are doing well was just checking if you followed up my case thanks be blessed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apachekamumbai (talk • contribs) 22:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

to whom it may concern i have talked about my issue and today 29th of july i have spoken with the person who wrote the wrong article and said that he didnt write it was a quote from a blog newspaper that he got the content from which was incorrect and i would like it be edited or deleted thanks with due respect — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apachekamumbai (talk • contribs) 09:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Apachekamumbai, I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. The quote from the book can be found here. If you feel the article is libelous, you may want to follow the instructions at WP:LIBEL. From the looks of it, though, the second paragraph of the article could just be removed, if this will solve the problems you face. I cannot delete the article myself but I hope this answers your question. TG HL ↗ 🍁 02:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

removing

thanks for the answer since it cannot be deleted then kindly remove the second paragraph and all shall be well for both parties thanks and be blessed

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	will you adopt me? Panda Parker (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

editing/delet

in your last conversation you have said the second paragraph can be removed should i be the one doing it or its you since am stopped from editing for doing it several times reasons that i didnt know about suckpets be of help thanks

hej

its more than two months still waiting for editing

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic X Cast and characters

Hey guys, why can't we enlist the cast members of Sonic X and the descriptions of the show, just like how you guys did with Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, Sonic the Hedgehog, Sonic Underground, and Sonic Boom. Why can't we do the same for Sonic X? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaeliaba (talk • contribs) 06:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Aaeliaba. I think you meant to post this on the talk page of Sonic X. User talk pages are for communication with specific editors, but article talk pages are used for discussing improvementsto articles. Consider posting your comment on the talk page of the article. TG HL ↗ 🍁 07:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Redundancy (engineering), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continental.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Canadian election templates

Hey, there are around 20 Canadian election templates that you've created that are unused (such as Template:1879 Ontario general election/Simcoe East). Are you planning adding them to articles? Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]