User talk:Unnamelessness

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Unnamelessness}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planet Coaster 2 (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NegativeMP1 was:

Exact same reason as SafariScribe. Please see WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Planet Coaster 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

λ NegativeMP1 07:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unnamelessness! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! λ NegativeMP1 07:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Results overturned. See the next entry. Unnamelessness (talk) 11:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planet Coaster 2 has been accepted

Planet Coaster 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 07:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Unnamelessness Sorry that took so long! Qcne (talk) 07:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 WTA Finals

Hello, my apologies for being wrong about the WTA 1000s best 6 of 7 format. I thought that Beijing would go with the rest of the WTA 1000s because it's the same situation as with Dubai (both are WTA 1000 and ATP 500), but I know now that it is not the case. So I had this idea of putting all seven WTA 1000s and naming that section 'Combined WTA 1000' with the option of one tournament result being replaced with one from Best other, hence narrowing the Best other section from 7 to 6 tournaments because 7th would be shown as a replacement for the worst combined WTA 1000 tournament which player doesn't count. It should be, of course, noted somewhere (bellow or above table) about that, and that replaced result would be written in italics and wouldn't be coloured. I would consider that change very important because visually it's much easier if you see results in columns belonging to each tournament than to check for every single result of a player what tournament it is. Thank you in advance. Xperiaray610 (talk) 02:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly against that. That is just purely sacrificing the clarity of how the ranking points are consisted of for the sake of so-called aesthetics. Unnamelessness (talk) 12:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]