User talk:Wiki-senetor

Jilla Poster

Apart from uploading a separate poster, u could have just over-written this image by clicking "Upload a new version of this file". -- Kailash29792 (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Peruchazhi movie poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Peruchazhi movie poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Wiki-senetor, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, the ENCYCLOPEDIA

It seems to me that your recent edits show that you do not quite grasp that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and as such, the tone, content and emphasis are far different from a celebrity gossip magazine article.

I encourage you to read WP:NOT and WP:OR and Wikipedia:V#Verifiability_does_not_guarantee_inclusion

Also please read about our formatting WP:MOSTABLE and WP:INDICSCRIPT. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Hi Wiki-senetor, I removed your recent contribution at Drishyam because it didn't seem constructive to me. Though I did explain my removal in my edit summary, I wanted to explain it in detail for your benefit. It is not our place as editors to make statements like, "Drishyam recieved highly positive reviews from critics as well as audience." The statement sounds like you are attempting to analyze all critical and audience response, which, even if you'd personally read every single review from every critic, would still constitute original research. Statements about overall critical response typically come from one of two sources, review aggregators Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic, and even then, they must be phrased so that it is clear the summary is coming from Metacritic instead of random Wikipedia editors: "Based on their tabulations, Metacritic assessed the critical response as mostly positive." I don't, however, believe that there is an acceptable review aggregator that deals in Bollywood and related films. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Drishyam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Unexplained removal of Verify Credibility template. Please do not remove these templates without either remedying the problem they address, or without explaining the removal on the article's talk page. In this case, there are questions as to whether or not the source used for box office gross is a reliable one, since there are few, if any, reliable sources for this content in Bollywood cinema. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peruchazhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia takes copyright seriously

When you are entering a plot of a film, you MUST use your own words and not cut and paste large swaths from other people's work.

In the occasions when we do allow short bits directly from someone else, the words MUST be appropriately attributed by using direct quotation marks to identify what is not our creation and including a footnote to show whose creation it is. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Twenty:20 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trader. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Twenty:20 (film)

Your recent editing history at Twenty:20 (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Twenty:20 (film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Bangbang43 reported by User:Wiki-senetor (Result: Both blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki-senetor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i had only restored the page to its best known revision, more over i am the one who reported the edit war. So its clear i didn't intended an edit war or wikipedia damage Wiki-senator 14:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Nevertheless you were edit warring, and in this context a 24 hour block is entirely reasonable. PhilKnight (talk) 23:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I recommend denying the unblock request. This editor posted a question about the image he does not prefer at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#File:Twenty20poster.jpg. I stated to him in unequivocal terms that the edit war needed to stop, and discussion needed to begin. I placed {{uw-3rr}} warnings on both this talk page and that of the person he is edit warring with (see this). Despite this, the other editor once again reverted [2], and the editor here requesting the unblock decided to continue the edit war by reverting [3], then making a report against Bangbang43 at WP:AIV ([4]), at WP:AN3 ([[5]), informing Bangbang43 of the AN3 request [6], and finally directly accusing Bangbang43 of vandalism [7]. 4 edits in 30 minutes regarding Bangbang43 and not once did he attempt to actually initiate a conversation on the subject with Bangbang43 either on the article's talk page (as he had been directed at WP:MCQ) or the editor's talk page. Rather than undo this block (which expires in 5 1/2 hours), the editor needs to be warned about the ramifications of continuing the edit war, stop making incorrect reports of vandalism, and strongly encouraged to follow Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Continuing the edit war when this block expires is NOT an option. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:53, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And STILL the edit war continues

Despite blocks to both of you (Wiki-senetor, Bangbang43) the edit war is still continuing as witnessed at the edit history of the article. You have been pointed to dispute resolution. You've been encouraged to discuss the issue on the article's talk page or on each other's talk pages. You were warned. Then you were blocked. Despite this, you continue the edit war while making no attempt to discuss. Edit warring DOES NOT WORK as you both should have ample proof of by now. If either of you makes one more reversion of the other, I will recommend a substantially longer block. I hope I have been clear. If I haven't then ASK QUESTIONS, do not continue the edit war. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rasam (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gulf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Twenty:20. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mfield (Oi!) 06:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki-senetor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am involved in an edit war because of the other user. He is vandalising the contents, uploading unlicensed promotional fake images, removing highly reliably sourced content saying it as poorly sourced. And what else he is not disrupting. I have already given him warnings, i was the one who reported about his activities and i am also blocked. what the ___? I was looking forward to discuss with him in his talk page. And now iam blocked for 1 week, pls don't say still your block would not effect it. Thankyou very much. Wiki-senator 07:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not seeing any clear vandalism and your own revert is labeled as "Reverting to better known version." You seem to be in a normal content dispute and should start a conversation on the article's talk page to discuss your position before making any future reverts. When you file a report at ANEW, the situation is reviewed in its entirety; your behavior is not exempt because you were the one to file a report. Kuru (talk) 13:13, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you indeed were looking forward to discussing the issues with him on his talk page, you certainly had PLENTY of opportunity to do so and failed at every juncture despite multiple warnings and instructions to you to do precisely that. I'm going to re-iterate my warning from before, hoping it does not fall on deaf ears again. If you continue the edit war after this block you can expect an extended block. I am not amused that an IP conducted edits that were effectively identical to yours. If I see evidence of an IP doing your work for you, a sockpuppet investigation may be in order. This ends. Now. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Because you have been evading your block by using a sockpuppet, and apparently also by editing without logging in, I cam here with the intention of doubling the block length. When I looked at your block history, however, I discovered that this is already the second block recently for edit warring on the same article. I have therefore blocked this account for a month. If necessary, the article can be protected, but I hope you will not make that necessary, as it will inconvenience legitimate editors too. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-senetor, I hope you are beginning to realize the edit war you have been conducting with this other editor, across many articles, is fruitless and pointless. There are now multiple people watching this case. You may escape notice temporarily, but not permanently. This edit war is completely against the aims and purpose of Wikipedia. It MUST end. I'm not interested in who is 'right'. Regardless of who is right, the edit war trumps all. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki-senetor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am no more involved in edit wars or sockpuppetry.I used socks, bcoz this a/c is blocked. And it is unfair to block me 2 times after the block expiry. I had made atleast more than 500 fair edits using this a/c before involved in edit waring. Edit war was circumstancial

Decline reason:

A block is aimed, not specifically at a named account, but at the editor using it. It is you, personally, who is blocked; using socks while blocked, and especially if you do so specifically because you are blocked, is block evasion and is absolutely not allowed. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Expiry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki-senetor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need an expiry date for my block Wiki-senator 11:19, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is no expiry because you keep freaking socking dude. At this point your only recourse is The Standard Offer.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! but i don't think so, and no thanks. I had already studied you people a lot. And don't think me as an idiot. Remember i know how to be as an undetected sock. But i am repeating my edits and behaviour because i just want to edit what i want to edit, and u know what it is. In my opinion you all are fools (no offense, i just said what i think, true) you girls are just trying to cure the disease not the source. Just go back and study why i keep creating socks. And stop mocking amateur editors, u may not, but ur friends are. Stop being teachers. Saviors of wikipedia. Wiki-senator 13:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peruchazhi movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peruchazhi movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grandmaster film.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grandmaster film.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lokpal.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lokpal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
Country Winners
Diversity winner
High quality contributors
Gender-gap fillers
Page improvers
Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
Diversity winner
Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list