User talk:Xnatedawgx

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Xnatedawgx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --evrik ^(talk) 10:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Waterford

The article The Waterford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MECU≈talk 03:02, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crux

In Crux (disambiguation) I have deleted your entry "* Crux, punk band", as it points to the page about the star constellation Crux (= the Southern Cross). If you restore this line, please provide more information about this punk band "Crux" and prove that it is notable: see WP:NN. Anthony Appleyard 04:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of California companies

I'm going to nominate List of California companies for deletion.--evrik ^(talk) 10:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted some of the edits you made to the articles in the California companies cat. I'm curious why you made those edits. --evrik ^(talk) 16:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gates Corporation

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Gates Corporation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.globalspec.com/Supplier/Profile/Gates. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 15:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Beacon International

The article Blue Beacon International has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 18:13, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:TacoJohnsModern.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:TacoJohnsModern.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jesus Wept (band)

A tag has been placed on Jesus Wept (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —trey^{omg he's back} 00:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Promise Keepers category

Hi there! Can you elaborate on this edit? The Assemblies of God article doesn't mention "Promise Keepers" and the Promise Keepers doesn't mention "Assemblies of God". If there's a connection can you add something to one of the articles? --Stormie 02:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Companies

Is there some sort of discussion on where it was decided to move everthing in the Portland area to the "companies based in Portland metro area"? One, it needs to be renamed as there is more than one Portland (that's why its Companies based in Portland, Oregon), and second we just moved away from a similar situation as editors had a tendincy to throw any business within 200 miles of Portland into the category, since the metro area tends to be an arbitrary and variable area (add changed frequently as Salem used to be part of it and Yamhill County did not). Thanks. Aboutmovies (talk) 01:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the category for deletion, here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 November 21#Category:Companies based in the Portland metropolitan area. Katr67 (talk) 15:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My comments on this user's entire collection of changes at Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Unnecessary_.28IMO.29_category_changes. What level of granularity makes sense? --CliffC (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alabama

Please do not change Category:Companies based in Alabama to Category:Companies based in Birmingham, Alabama on company pages. If you would like to add the catergory, please make it seperate from Category:Companies based in Alabama. Thanks

--BhamAla (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Caribbean International link suggestion.

I got a response back from one editor of the page, who thought adding my site might have merit. He suggested asking other page editors to consider the site and see if a link can/should be added. I'm noticing that there is already a link to a site described as an "independent" resource on RCI, and with due respect to that sites owner, it is a fraction of the resource and project I am working on myself. The community is growing in activity, provides information not seen elsewhere on the internet. Not that it is the intent of Wikipedia to become a large-scale links page, but I would argue RoyalCaribbeanFan.com warrants a link given established standards already on display.

The specific site link is www.RoyalCaribbeanFan.com.

I'd appreciate a few more people looking into it, and possibly acting on adding the link if it does have the merit it would seem to have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NWLB (talk • contribs) 05:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

In reviewing your edit history, it is apparent that you make it a habit of not providing an edit summary. Editors are encouraged to always use edit summaries. Doing so helps to communicate your intent/reasoning behind your edits. See WP:ES. Thanks. ++Arx Fortis 00:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A good example of why this is important would be your recent edit to Griffin Technology. You removed Category:Companies based in Tennessee [1] (I'm assuming because it was redundant to Category:Companies based in Nashville), but because you didn't use an edit summary, another edit was confused as to why and reverted you.[2]

There's a way of making sure you always use an edit summary. Go to Special:Preferences, and click on the "Editing" tab. The last option is "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary", which if checked, will prevent you from leaving blank edit summaries. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Malt-O-Meal Company

I have nominated Category:Malt-O-Meal Company (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. SQL ^{Query me!} 20:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Alabama companies

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Alabama companies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of Alabama companies. Ank329 (talk) 03:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Estes Park, Colorado

Thanks for you recent edit to Estes Park, Colorado about the old ski areas. Although I was well aware of Hidden Valley (my father-in-law ran the ski school there in the late 70s and early 80s and my wife and her sisters were all ski instructors there) I wasn't aware of the earlier ones. Very cool - again, thanks! Merenta (talk) 20:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of New York companies

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of New York companies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of New York companies. Ank329 (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airport categories

I have nominated the ones you have created for deletion. It is not clear that these categories are needed and I believe that they will be deleted. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Alaska companies

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Alaska companies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of Alaska companies. Ank329 (talk) 18:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wyoming companies

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Wyoming companies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of Wyoming companies. Ank329 (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First American Bank (Alabama)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article First American Bank (Alabama), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WFTDA

Women's Flat Track Derby Association seems to be based in North Carolina, and only uses a St. Louis PO box as a public contact address. The corporation has been registered in North Carolina since Dec 8 2006.[3] Do you have other info pointing to St. Louis? —mjb (talk) 00:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Milwaukee Community Sailing Center

An editor has nominated Milwaukee Community Sailing Center, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milwaukee Community Sailing Center and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Eastmain (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Airline categories

There is a discussion on the project page about adding transportation and economy categories to airline articles. Basically the consensus seems to be saying these are not appropriate categories for airline articles. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

This editor is a
**Journeyman Editor**
and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**.

AfD nomination of KMC Controls

An article that you have been involved in editing, KMC Controls, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KMC Controls. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 18:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Economy of (city)" categories

Based on a this discussion it is clear that your adding of this type of category to every business article is not a reasonable use of categories. Please refrain from doing so in the future. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above. You often add multiple categories for "Economy of ..." to individual company articles. A company is properly listed under the category "Companies based in (City, State)." Excess and inappropriate categorization make wikipedia less relevant and harder to navigate.

For example, all of the categories you had added Here were inappropriate and deleted.OccamzRazor (talk) 21:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lewisville Independent School District

Thanks for adding categories to the Lewisville Independent School District article. I just wanted to clarify that if you add Carrollton, it would be wise to also add cities that are also mostly served by LISD (such as Flower Mound). Again, thanks for helping --- Collegebookworm (talk) 03:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of La Posada Hote

A tag has been placed on La Posada Hote requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dillard421 ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hamilton Township, Mercer County, New Jersey

In the New Jersey Township categories you have created, you have included the Category:Townships in New Jersey, which applies to the Township itself and not to the category. The category has been removed here and in other such categories. Alansohn (talk) 05:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the Category:Clifton, New Jersey, you included Category:Cities in New Jersey. Again, Clifton is a city; the items in the category are note. Please reflect this in creating any future categories. Alansohn (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

False edit comments

Please do not use false edit comments to remove navigation templates that are being correctly used. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there are problems with a template either fix the template or ask for help or corrections on the talk page for the template. Removing a good template from an article is generally considered vandalism. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

more on Las Vegas hospitals

Maybe it is best if there were no categories in the template? When the template was started, the articles had no categories and it only had a few articles. As hospitals have been added and it now covers, Henderson, LV, the county and NLV maybe it is time to simply remove all of the categories. I'll do that. Can you check to make sure that the hospitals are either in the county page or one for the city? Vegaswikian (talk) 18:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are no categories being added by the template. However if you look in the various categories, the article may still appear since the system is apparently behind in making updates. If you manually edit the articles, they will display correctly. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changing "bridges" to "towers"

Few people would consider a suspension bridge a "tower". Is there some category description which explains this? Tedickey (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McGhee Tyson Airport

I reverted your deletion of Category:Knoxville, Tennessee in article McGhee Tyson Airport. It is not actually located in Knoxville, but it is Knoxville's principal airport and is mentioned more than once in article Knoxville, Tennessee. Therefor it belongs in Category:Knoxville, Tennessee Dbiel ^(Talk) 07:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply Dbiel ^(Talk) 17:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject National Register of Historic Places

I replied on my talk page too, but I'd like to extend to you an invitation to participate in WP:NRHP, where you can find Elkman's NRHP Infobox Generator, among other things, that semi-automatically generates infoboxes and formatting for NRHP articles. Happy editing! Acroterion _(talk) 19:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Building complexes

Category:Building complexes, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 11:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Towers in Alabama

I have removed your placement of Garywood Assembly of God from Category:Towers in Alabama. As a member of the church, I do not feel that the "tower" on the front of the building really qualifies as a tower in the true sense of the word. Moreover, the angle at which that photo was taken makes the "tower" look more imposing than it actually is. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced categories

Please do not add categories without a sourced statement in the article to support the category, as you did in Kill Bill. It violates Wikipedia's policy of verifiability. Ward3001 (talk) 00:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: UCB/city of Berkeley buildings category changes

How do you plan to handle buildings that are owned by the university but not in the city of berkeley (ssl, albany village, richmond field station, etc)? 66.92.14.198 (talk) 04:23, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the category adds and refinements on historical and Florida stuff. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Anchorage Hilton.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anchorage Hilton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Antlers Hilton Hotel

A tag has been placed on Antlers Hilton Hotel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 07:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Historic house museums cat refine

ooh good! We're both working on this mess at the same time :) I'm creating child cats where needed as US/Italy only was insane -- added UK and Australia so far. Hotcat is wonderful

Clarian Health People Mover

Hello, I notice that you've edited Transportation in Indianapolis in the past; would you be able to help in taking a Wikipedia-compatible photograph for the Clarian Health People Mover article? —Sladen (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii categories

Good job on the categories. We actually need a lot of expansion and work on Category:Hawaii, so if you keep the lines of communication open, I'm hoping we can work together to achieve the same goals. Would you be interested in joining WP:HAWAII in order to work closer with the project on this task? Viriditas (talk) 05:06, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand why you are dropping the towns, for example in Category:Maui when they are already tagged as part of the county. Could you explain? Towns are already categorized in the county cats under Category:Geography of Maui. We don't need the duplication in the parent cat, so please stop for now. Viriditas (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are already in the Maui category under Category:Geography of Maui. Please stop duplicating the categories under the parent. The parent category, Category:Maui should be empty except for articles that need categories or higher (top) level articles. This is why I've asked you to join WikiProject Hawaii and discuss what you want to do with the project. If you talked about this first, you would know this. The project has a lot of categorization tasks that need work, so we would welcome your help, but what you are doing is not helping. If you want to help categorize Maui articles, the first thing you can do is find Maui articles that do not have a Maui category and add them to Category:Maui. That's one thing you can do. Then, they can be moved to subcats in most instances. But, duplicating categories is not helping, as I'm just going to remove all the categories you have added. Viriditas (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you are mistaken. All of the towns that are categorized by county (such as the ones you are adding Maui to) are already members of the Geography category. It's been there for a long time. If you need help, let me know, but please stop what you are doing. Viriditas (talk) 05:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here, this might help you:

Geography of Maui

Landforms of Maui

Protected areas of Maui

Do you see Maui County listed above? Viriditas (talk) 05:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The towns are there, look again. It's under Maui County, Hawaii. If they aren't, then they should be added to that category. Remember, Maui County is a subcategory of Geography of Maui, which is a subcat of Maui. Viriditas (talk) 05:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit more complicated than that, but if you would like to start a discussion about the current categorization scheme, you are welcome to do so on the project talk page. Viriditas (talk) 05:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've made some good suggestions. I'm going to take what you've proposed under consideration and come up with a solution. Thanks for analyzing the problem. Viriditas (talk) 05:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try and summarize the comments and put them on the project talk page. I'll also invite suggestions from others. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion at any time. Viriditas (talk) 06:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still working on it... Viriditas (talk) 12:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UM

As I've stated on the discussion page (which I left up for a week before changing to allow for any discussion), and in my edit, no one calls the University of Minnesota "UM". That is why I have deleted it from the page. Please do not revert to the previous form without a rationale for your explanations. Thank you. Dpodoll68 (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable.

This page is to help determine whether an organization (commercial or otherwise), or any of its products and services, is a valid subject for a Wikipedia article. The scope of this guideline covers all groups of people organized together for a purpose, although people gathered for more specific purposes may be governed by more specific guidelines. For example, people gathered together for the purpose of making music are covered by WP:MUSIC.

Simply stated, an organization is a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose. This includes commercial and non-commercial activities including, but not limited to, charitable organizations, educational institutions, hospitals, institutions, interest groups, organizations, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, religious denominations, sects, etc.

This guideline does not cover small groups of closely related people such as families, entertainment groups, co-authors, and co-inventors covered by WP:Notability (people).

Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeltaLodgeDown (talk • contribs) 22:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hilton Anchorage

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hilton Anchorage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not a particularly notable building, the sources cited are not reliable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Xnatedawgx! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 331 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Mike Sares - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bourse

I'm not really sure; all the sources I'd normally use say 125 feet. Could very well have a been typo. Niagara ^{Don't give up the ship} 17:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christian sportspeople categories nominated for deletion

I don't think that they categories should be been created because I believe that they are overcategorization. Please give your opinion as to why you created the categories and your rationale to keep them at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_August_7#Category:American_Christian_sportspeople. Royal broil 22:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Charles Robinson (referee)

I saw from the history log that you previously edited the article, Charles Robinson (referee) in one capacity or another. I am only, for the record, contacting registered users who have edited the page as editors possessing an IP are subject to change at any point. This is a small notification to inform you that it has been nominated for deletion and a discussion is presently taking place on whether or not it should remain. If you wish to, please feel free to contribute any opinions you may have to the discussion. Thank you. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 22:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Templates v. categories

Please be careful when deleting templates from articles, as you've done to Interstate 35W (Texas). Although you've added categories more specific, removing the template has also removed a navigation box. —C.Fred (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token d875c1616156f6537807b10829fbd6b8

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 8eecd2637822d5f5694bc0f27360eb5b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

A beer for you!

And I would like to buy you a real one someday. Sincerely, Denverjeffrey. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Mountain Construction II Company

Can you explain this redirect to me? And the category? The redirect is in Companies based in New Mexico, but Twin Mountain isn't discussed in the article on Kiewit Corporation, which is based in Nebraska. Yworo (talk) 04:03, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 32c2b3a122f3b9a4bf21d494fe9e0a81

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 21e9edfef376d3b86e02a3b8c36e70e5

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Academic buildings

Category:Academic buildings, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University and college academic buildings in the United States

Category:University and college academic buildings in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Invisible Children

Category:Invisible Children, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of XDISCIPLEx A.D. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XDISCIPLEx A.D. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XDISCIPLEx A.D. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I am One of Many (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Memorial bridges

Category:Memorial bridges, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Memorial highways

Category:Memorial highways, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blue_Star_Memorial_Highways

... is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_September_26#Category:Blue_Star_Memorial_Highways. DexDor (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blue Star Memorial Highways

Category:Blue Star Memorial Highways, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 02:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Memorial highways

Category:Memorial highways, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HeavenFest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everfound. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RTD Line template

I admire how much effort you have put in to add all of the crossings to the Template:RTD B Line, Template:RTD G Line, and Template:RTD N Line pages, but I think it looks really cluttered now. Before it was simple to see which stations came in which order, but now you have to look through a bunch of other stuff. Some of the other line templates, i.e. Template:RTD C Line and Template:RTD D Line etc, only include the major highways that the route crosses. I think this leads to a cleaner look while still including some orienting landmarks. I would propose we do the same with the B, G, and N Line templates as well. Is this agreeable to you? Thanks, -Killian441 (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Your attention is called to a merger proposal at Talk:Oxford Hotel (Denver, Colorado). BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

Because you edited the page about cheeseburgers. SuperJendrej (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29th & Welton Station

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 29th & Welton Station, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 29th & Welton (RTD). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station name

You should conform to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (US stations) with your article renaming. I think you are probably unaware of the existence of those guidelines. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29th & Welton

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 29th & Welton (RTD) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 29th & Welton Station. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 11:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You might look in on

…the Scum/SOTEC article. It has undergone a major update. Remember, the goal is accurate to sources, and so we can only improve it to the extent that sources give us material. As a Denver native/ex-pat, you may know of sources that can be used to improve the article. (And perhaps can source the Lincoln Park statement.)

We have the Merritt article at RNS in 2014, another stray one or two similarly recent (but with limited content), then we are back at 2011 and earlier. Point is, we do not have (i) a well-sourced recent history of church changes and direction, (ii) a thorough history of church leadership at the various sites. (As well, the Co. Springs church is discrepantly presented either as unaffiliated or as a sister church in different references.)

Point is, I have done almost as much as I can, given the sources and what I know. Someone who knows and cares about the old sources needs to weigh in, as does someone with more recent sourcing. Note, I am aware that some awkwardnesses are still in place (e.g., the Leadership section, separated because so spotty in source and fact, and the chronologic Further reading). THese are temporary, and explained in notes in the markup (also temporary). Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station article titles

Please see WP:USSTATION and WP:NCCAPS: "Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in an article title, unless the title is a proper name." Do not move again without a discussion. You have already improperly moved some other station articles with cut and paste. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1801 California Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transamerica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename category

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Food company headquarters in the United States to Category:Food and drink company headquarters in the United States Hugo999 (talk) 04:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Xnatedawgx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Xnatedawgx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Athletics clubs in the United States has been nominated for discussion

Category:Athletics clubs in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 15:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Xnatedawgx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citibank South Dakota, N.A. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Citibank South Dakota, N.A.. Since you had some involvement with the Citibank South Dakota, N.A. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sachimo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sachimo. Since you had some involvement with the Sachimo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 22:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mark Jackson in 2007.JPG

The file File:Mark Jackson in 2007.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omni Interlocken Resort for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omni Interlocken Resort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omni Interlocken Resort until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 05:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omni Interlocken Resort for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omni Interlocken Resort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omni Interlocken Resort (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 05:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:First National Bank buildings

A tag has been placed on Category:First National Bank buildings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Bonneville Dam. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 03:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historic buildings and structures in the United States has been nominated for deletion

Category:Historic buildings and structures in the United States has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xnatedawgx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

VPN has been turned off, please unblock, thank you

Decline reason:

If your VPN is now off, you also need to clear your browser cache and wait 24 hours for the block to clear your system. 331dot (talk) 07:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.