Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Singh Naruka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . ✗plicit 14:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Singh Naruka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NPOL ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He has not held any office that would constitute an "inherent" notability claim under WP:NPOL #1, and the article is referenced nowhere near well enough to earn him a sourceability-based notability pass under WP:NPOL #2. Bearcat (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. NPOL is a great guide to show the clearly notable, but in the great grey area of local pols and appointees, I think the BLP policy would defer to GNG and this article does not have the sources to pass GNG. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). BLP is policy, and has priority over the other BIO SNGs (including NPOL) which are guidelines and essays. // Timothy :: talk 21:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.