Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autonational Rescue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autonational Rescue

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG. HAs been an orphan since 2016 and has been written like an ad since 2011. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Transportation, and United Kingdom. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Newspaper mentions of the brand/service in public surveys and motoring tips carried out under its name. The surveys are about various motoring issues e.g. hospital parking charges. The organisation has some mentions in comparisons with similar services but found little of note. Insufficient indepth coverage to pass GNG/NCORP unless more is found. Rupples (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.