Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basdeo Mangru

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Basdeo Mangru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Associate professor at a not-terribly-important university. Has written a few books, but they don't seem like they've had a major impact. H-index of 4 according to google scholar. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Early career academic. GS h index of 4. Too early yet. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, he has many hits on GoogleBooks and several on GoogleNews citing his as an expert and quoting his books. I have added 3 references to the article and there are many more out there. J04n(talk page) 22:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. In Google news archive, I find only a few trivial mentions of him and a very brief review of one of his books in the New York Daily News [1]. I don't think that's enough for WP:GNG, and I don't see the evidence of substantial scholarly impact needed to pass WP:PROF#C1. But he undoubtedly exists, has written some books, and is occasionally cited as an expert for them. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.