Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carly Wilford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:TOOSOON Missvain (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carly Wilford

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DJ/producer who isn't quite there yet (WP:TOOSOON). Hasn't charted and hasn't received substantial coverage about her, mostly just passing mentions and press releases. TAXIDICAE💰 12:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - currently fails WP:MUSICBIO, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:GNG. I see lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. Sources used in the article, (excepting this) such as this and this are blogs, this constitutes as a passing mention while this is an interview with the subject and does not include any commentary from the interviewer which makes it neither secondary nor independent, and cannot be used to demonstrate notability. The subject is not notable as a musician or a broadcaster with no recordings that have charted on national charts, or received certifications or accolades, or any in-depth coverage in the relevant field of work. --Ashley yoursmile! 15:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly passes notability guidelines. Thedangeroz (talk) 18:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC) — Thedangeroz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.