Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles S. Rushe Middle School
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Charles S. Rushe Middle School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe that articles about middle schools meet WP:N Tpk5010 (talk) 18:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Middle schools generally aren't notable, and there aren't enough third party sources for this school to pass the general notability guideline.--TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 19:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Changing my vote to Keep based on the recent expansion of the article; it's evident that it passes the general notability guideline now. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Middle schools are not inherently notable, but the long-established practice is that their articles should be merged into those of their school district or locality rather than being deleted. In this case, however, there is an abundance of reliable sources to indicate that the school passes the general notability guideline. -- Eastmain (talk) 21:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - sources available to meet WP:ORG. TerriersFan (talk) 02:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This isn't about the middle school. Writing about the school is simply an excuse for bringing in dirt about two different persons who happened to have taught at the school. Forget WP:ORG, I'd worry more about WP:BLP. I'm waiting for someone to add a story about a teacher touching someone's breast. Mandsford (talk) 18:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - you have a good point. I have thinned out the accounts and removed the salacious details. TerriersFan (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 17:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No encyclopedic content. This school opened in 2007, and all that has happened is a couple of teachers getting in trouble in comedic/tragic ways. Of local interest only. Once deleted, create a redirect to Pasco County Schools. Glittering Pillars (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems encyclopedic enough to me. Merge to Pasco County Schools. Polarpanda (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Glittering Pillars and then redirect to Pasco County Schools. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect per Glittering Pillars. ThemFromSpace 22:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the schools article: while the subject shouldn't stand on its own, there's some useful information — already properly sourced — that could be useful in a small section on this school. Nyttend (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and add necessary content to the article for the school district, as usual with middle schools. The incidents inclusion violates both NOT TABLOID an the do no harm guidelines, for minor events in a person;'s life. It does not matter if the article is a bio article or not, the rule applies regardless. Delete first in this case, (or merge, using only appropriate parts of the edit history) to remove it from the history. DGG ( talk ) 16:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.