Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoph Schwoebel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 09:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Christoph Schwoebel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP. No indication of meeting the specific WP:PROF or WP:GNG. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. GS cites are 14, 9, 9, 6, 5, 5, 5,.... This is low, but systematic theology is unlikely to be a highly cited area. Advice is needed on library holdings and from cognate scholars. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete without prejudice. No indication of notability in relevant fields as of yet. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 00:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - does not appear to meet the second criteron of WP:PROF. No significant external confirmation of his notability. Look him up on Google Scholar and he has a few of his works cited by others, but none by any significant journal or publication. Cheers! -- Lord Roem (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: went through GS, sufficient citations for notability. Dewritech (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nothing in gnews, you would expect a scholar to get some mention. There are not gscholar citations in major journals. LibStar (talk) 08:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
