Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. John Morris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. John Morris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Municipal government employee ("Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator for the city of Anchorage") fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Also, title fails MOS:HON KidAd • SPEAK 23:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and West Virginia. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Medicine, and Alaska. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One reasonable source, related to work as homeless coordinator. Nothing else. Article probably written by a relative of subject. Most of article, other than section on homelessness, not well-sourced. Fails WP:NPOL WP:BIO. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table: prepared by User:rsjaffe
Treinen, Lex		superficial coverage	✘ No
Rivera, Daniella		just a name callout	✘ No
Theriault Boots, Michelle		Interview and background info	✔ Yes
Bronson, Dave	Mayor's page	Just a name	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Delete - Fails notability criteria. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete when an article lists that the person is one of more than 4,000 of something in the US, but tries to make that sound like a significant claim, it is clealry overly pormotional. There are not enough sources that adeuqately cover him to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability requirements. Gusfriend (talk) 10:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per rsjaffe's assessment table (and subsequent searches for additional sourcing), fails GNG and does not meet WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.