Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabbla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbla

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film is unsourced since 11years. NP83 (talk) 02:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Algeria, and France. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is one of a number of articles about films selected for the Festival of African Cinema whose information was captured in WP via CC BY-SA under a Wikipedia:WikiAfrica/Share Your Knowledge initiative, but where the original online resources no longer exist. For such initiatives, perhaps clearer source preservation is needed from outset? AllyD (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have added a couple of references showing critical reception of this film. As well as these, the intro to a 2009 festival showing said that "With his second feature (...) Tariq Teguia proves himself to be the most important new director in Algeria" [1]. More recently, the synopsis of a paywalled Journal of African Cinemas article (2016) claims "that Tariq Teguia's 2008 film "Inland" establishes a new frontier for North African cinema with the creation of a unique visual style that moves away from the thematic considerations of national cinema." [2]. Overall, I think there is enough independent coverage for WP:NFILM. AllyD (talk) 10:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as two reliable sources reviews have been added to the article and together with the coverage mentioned above WP:GNG is passed so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.