Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grumpy Man DJs
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Nothing that passes WP:MUSIC here. ELIMINATORJR 21:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Grumpy Man DJs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Notability of this group is not clear. Sancho 08:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google reveals no reliable secondary sources. Their least tenuous claim to fame is that they hosted a club night that Portishead played at once. Fails WP:N 3tmx 08:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Going from their press page plus the items added on Talk:Grumpy Man DJs it seems like there are sufficient secondary sources to verify the basic facts. William Pietri 10:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Well that they exist; the BBC listings are BBC bristol i.e. local and Venue magazine is a local magazine. Wouldn't say that necesssarily makes them notable 3tmx 22:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Plus all the stuff on the talk page is just a brief sentence in the context of the secret portishead gig they put on - not coverage relating to them directly —Preceding unsigned comment added by 3tmx (talk • contribs) 22:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Crazytales talk/desk 19:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notablility means more than a mention on a BBC review article. Not even close. MarkBul 20:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.