Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HandWallet
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- HandWallet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. Possible vanity piece? Shritwod (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't meet the WP:GNG as far as I can tell. SmartSE (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant reliable source coverage. Refs provided are a forum, a download site, and a brief review on appszoom.com which does not appear reliable. A search did not turn up any significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 09:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.