Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illico (Videotron)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vidéotron#Television. RL0919 (talk) 20:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Illico (Videotron)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested redirect - tons of uncited material which should not have been re-added as per WP:BURDEN, and there's not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Videotron, nothing notable about the television service. This reads like Promo and I can't find coverage of it, only listings of the TV packages. Oaktree b (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Videotron Depreciated 2000s branding for their HD and digital cable services. Nate • (chatter) 21:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per last two users. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 03:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as this saves history in case of sudden significant notability change. However, don't see it yet, too. Suitskvarts (talk) 10:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per everybody. There's not really much case for having two separate articles about a cable television company and its digital subscription package, especially given that this article is relying entirely on the company's own self-published primary source content about itself rather than any evidence of WP:GNG-worthy media coverage about it. There might be a case for a standalone article about Club Illico the streaming service (we do, for instance, have separate articles about Crave the pay TV movie-channel bundle and Crave the streamer), but that isn't a foregone conclusion and also isn't this — as things currently stand, even Club Illico is currently just a redirect to Vidéotron rather than its own separate article. Bearcat (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Videotron unneeded CFORK. // Timothy :: talk 05:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.