Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntelliTalk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Legoktm (talk) 01:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IntelliTalk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A longstanding unreferenced article summarising the features of a software package. This particular IntelliTalk product (there are others in other fields) appears to have been merged into Synapse Adaptive's wider classroom tool package. Searches find a couple of brief product summaries (in a product range summary by IntelliTools Inc.; and in a chapter in an "Engaging the Resistant Child" book) These are enough to make a PROD inappropriate, but I don't think they are sufficient to demonstrate that the software package attained notability. AllyD (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Software. AllyD (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep -- Appears to be a fair amount of academic coverage, at least some of which seems substantial enough (case studies, etc.) and at least one of which is cited by others (the Symington and Stanger). The breadth of the dates are also promising as it suggests longevity/use beyond the initial release. Obviously the actual article needs a rewrite per MOS:DATED. Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Synapse Adaptive would make sense, but it's red-linked. Delete if no redirect target. Oaktree b (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete right now it looks not notable, however the academia coverage could help. Assirian cat (talk) 10:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for want significant coverage. Mentions of use of the software aren't substantive. Were "Synapse Adaptive" to have an article, it could be mentioned there. --Bejnar (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article lacks any third-party sources that have significant coverage of the subject. The sources mentioned above are trivial and routine product listings at best, and the way the book entry is worded it reads like a product description provided by the company itself. There's a good reason why the article is as small as it is, and that's because there's no reliable sources to make an article of any substance with. - Aoidh (talk) 23:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.