Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isa Baghirov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 06:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isa Baghirov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability? Looks like a promotional article on a non-notable topic. Wikisaurus (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. article reminded me of the Lunatic charlatans essay. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it The person has enough resources. He was a TV presenter on Russia's Channel 1. He is also a book author. I ask for a detailed investigation of the person.--MrTaghizade (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

note: editor is the creator of the article, also claims to (if I understood correctly) to have taken the picture in the article [1] which makes him a possible undisclosed paid editor. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this article is also up for deletion on az-wp: [2] -- asilvering (talk) 05:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I should also add: I don't think these are reliable, independent sources, but I don't want to !vote delete when I can't read them myself. -- asilvering (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no serious independent sources. Loew Galitz (talk) 23:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Person is the TV personality but fail WP:BLP and WP:NP henrycruise01
Comment I think we should wait to see if the AZ language article is deleted, and then follow that as a precedent, but I can't read the RS that is in the article, so otherwise can't comment. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.