Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Józef Piotrowski (organist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Józef Piotrowski (organist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable longevity claim. All of the few sources are routine coverage, and give us no meaningful information about the subject. WP:NOPAGE. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This poorly sourced article fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO1E, and WP:NOPAGE. There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like his passion was music and he played an instrument since 1905. This WP:PERMASTUB is not needed. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:53, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. All the sources used in this article are useless. They either no longer work or are totally unreliable. The source used for his date of death says it all:

"Information is posted based on information published on the Internet or information you gave us, but sorry if there is content that is incorrectly entered". So nothing on there can be verified. The only other reference that works appears to be a brief obituary but doesn't tell us when he died. Doesn't matter anyway because it doesn't help establish notability. Not seeing a suitable redirect since his death date can't be verified. CommanderLinx (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could not find any reliable sources to suggest this person ever existed. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 18:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have to admit I am surprised at how many poorly sourced "oldest x" articles we have. Although we have lots and lots of poorly sourced articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete claimed to be older than the oldest verified man. Nope. Non-notable Hoax. Legacypac (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - One of those who were known only for claiming themselves to be oldest or very old. These subjects lack significant coverage especially when we take their extraordinary claims into account. This is similar to other recently nominated articles. Rzvas (talk) 16:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.