Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Electronic Defense

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Association of Old Crows. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of Electronic Defense

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The cited reference from Google Books is a brief directory entry; the only other is from its publisher, which is not independent. Upon searches ([1], [2], [3]), any other findings are either sales links or similar brief mentions rather than anything going toward actual significant coverage that would indicate notability. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Association of Old Crows. I couldn't find coverage of it either, but I found tons of papers on JSTOR and Google Scholar that cite it. Which, I guess, speaks to reputation but doesn't help with notability. Schazjmd (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. signed, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 22:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect per above; I am unable to find evidence of notability, and a standalone article is inappropriate. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with a merger, per above. Sandstein 09:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes: merge. This isn't a perfect fit for WP:SJ but I feel that it's close enough for the reasoning given there to apply.—S Marshall T/C 15:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, Not notable to stand alone, merge to Association of Old Crows. Alex-h (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.