Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Brown (defensive tackle)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, sources have been found. (non-admin closure)‎ Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Brown (defensive tackle)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable athlete. No significant coverage. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and American football. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG with no WP:SIGCOV. Willing to reconsider if coverage is made available so please ping me. Frank Anchor 15:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to keep per sources added by Alvaldi. Frank Anchor 18:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete never made it past a practice squad so never had an NFL career. ArcAngel (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per source improvements. ArcAngel (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:GNG with sources from his college career. Found this on Newspapers.com [1], then couple of articles in the Los Angeles Times covering him, Brown Tests Well but Aims Higher, Brown’s Working His Way Back In and one from the Orange County Register. @Frank Anchor:@ArcAngel:, what's your take on them? Alvaldi (talk) 10:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per sources found by Alvaldi. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Alvaldi's sources. Admittedly they are a little light individually. But the LA Times coverage counts as one source for GNG purposes and put these two articles together, not to mention additional minor coverage from the LA Times I found on newspapers.com and the LA Times seems to have given him significant coverage. So that is 2 sources with significant coverage plus what I would call intermediate coverage from the Orange County Register, and I think he just clears the GNG bar. Rlendog (talk) 19:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.