Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuki Grewal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kuki Grewal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Actor. Fails WP:GNG Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tagged for GNG since 2015. -Cupper52^Discuss! 18:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough news coverage for WP:GNG. Pilean (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject does not meet any criteria of WP:NACTOR. Applying the less strict WP:BASIC where WP:SIGCOV is not always required compared to WP:GNG, the subject is still not notable. Two of three sources provided in the article are too trivial; the remaining one is not wp:independent being an interview without original content. Doing wp:before searches yield very low quality results that are either not relevant, not wp:reliable, or not wp:independent. For valid sources, the combined coverage as required by WP:BASIC is not significant enough to warrant an article. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 03:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete snow is falling. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.