Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Piece Theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Last Piece Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Made up theory. A total of one ghit. Lurker 17:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for above reason. --Sdornan 17:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obvious original research. BassoProfundo 18:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "We have enough food to last 30,000 years, but we've only got one after eight mint left, and everyone's too polite to take it." - Holly (Me²). Someguy1221 21:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per nom Bigdaddy1981 23:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: nonsense, original research, no real information, just links. Hu 06:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete could be a real phenomenon, but without citations, comes across as total OR. Debivort 06:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even the example is hilarious. -- Magioladitis 09:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:OR or Urban legend. Bearian 18:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
