Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal muscle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. yandman 09:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable book (see WP:BK for guidelines): no independent critical commentary, etc. the user who started this article has the same name as the article of the book. Calliopejen1 23:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the nomination, and note that the sentence "Collins, who edits the site at www.steroidlaw.com, is a recognized authority on the topic..." makes the article look like self-promotion. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — Swpb talk contribs 22:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
