Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Keenan (Covid 19 Vaccine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Missvain (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Keenan (Covid 19 Vaccine)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is only known for being the first person to receive the vaccine. Otherwise, her life was unremarkable. A clear case of WP:ONEEVENT. A redirect could be left to e.g. COVID-19 vaccine. It is unlikely she will become separately notable in the future. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Keep subject has been covered in number of news and other media independently. If Dolly (sheep) can have a wiki page, so can the subject owing the same logic. Thanks.Tabletop123 (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not convinced by the Dolly (sheep) parallel. There are lots of details available about Dolly's scientific legacy and the extraordinary circumstances of her birth, about how a team of researchers planned the cloning. A better example for your case would be Rosa Parks: while being notable for mainly one event, lots has been written about her since. Yes there is coverage of Margaret Keenan. But it will all give you the same info: her age, her former job and her getting the jab. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've just seen that there is already an article (Margaret Keenan) which went the way I proposed. So this one might be an A10 speedy delete. Though the page in question is a redirect and not a page now. Modussiccandi (talk) 23:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Delete per above. Sincerely, TheCartoonEditor. talk to me? see what i've done 23:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A10, as per Modussiccandi's comment above - recently created article that duplicates an existing page. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to BNT162b2#Emergency use authorization, exactly the same as Margaret Keenan. This title is a highly plausible search term, as she is the first recipient of this particular COVID-19 vaccine, and indeed is probably far more recognized than the actual article title.
Redirect is supported by the text at both WP:CSD#A10 and WP:ATD-R. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable other than being first in line. Oaktree b (talk) 02:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete classic WP:BLP1E. Can be mentioned as a one-line in another article. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect - I don't mind which. Classic case of a living person notable only for one event. Already mentioned at BNT162b2, which is enough. Spiderone 09:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A10. Would've originally said redirect but it seems this article already exists. ser! (let's discuss it). 16:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Subject has numerous articles dedicated to her and the whole world knows her, is that enough for notability? Thanks.Tabletop123 (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability is not even a question, she is not. This is a wrong forum RfD. The topic is covered at BNT162b2#Emergency use authorization. This is a plausible search term. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.