Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Liam Lockran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Master Liam Lockran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. No independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. Substantially promotional elements, created by SPA. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. I came across this article after dealing with some copyvios related to the subject over on Commons and I was planning to AfD but it looks like you beat me to it. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with what I can do to help save this article from deletion. I added his notable Vanity Fair Magazine article. Does that help? [[User:SutortaSutorta (talk) 21:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)]][reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This vanity fair article about him would be a one line mention of a master liam in an articlem about Murdock and myspace? None of the other sourcing is anywhere close to cutting the mustard. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - Fails PORNBIO. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 02:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.