Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayleen Ramey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 10:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mayleen Ramey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a television host, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for television hosts. The notability claim here is that she exists as a person who has had a job, but that isn't an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of media coverage about her to establish her significance -- but the only source here is the self-published primary source website of her own (former?) employer, which is not a notability maker. And the article's been flagged for lacking reliable and independent sourcing since 2010, without ever having even one new source added in the intervening decade. Bearcat (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: - article fails WP:BASIC --Whiteguru (talk) 07:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.