Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meisam Rafiei
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Meisam Rafiei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Taekwondo competitor who's claim to fame is being denied entry into the U.S. because of Donald Trump's travel ban. Although he has competed at the senior world championships, his highest world ranking ever apparently was 59th, which does not show notability. He is currently ranked 73rd. Clear case of WP:BLP1E and definitely fails the notability standards for martial artists at WP:MANOTE. Sandals1 (talk) 19:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sandals1 (talk) 19:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Sandals1 (talk) 19:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Delete - it's a borderline case, but after researching this he isn't notable enough yet as a martial arts practitioner and does has reliable sources but fails WP:BLP1E Mujinga (talk) 22:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with the previous editors. I don't think he meets WP:MANOTE and I didn't see the coverage I believe is required to meet WP:GNG because I believe it's all about one event (which means WP:BLP1E applies). Papaursa (talk) 20:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.