Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Paul Cummins (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Paul Cummins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to be largely self-promotional. Sources for the article are largely self-published or arise from social networking sites. Search results seem to direct to this page or copies of it, or to more social networking sites. The subject of the article does not appear to be notable. The article itself was created in September 2013; an earlier version of this article was proposed for deletion, and subsequently deleted, in July 2013. RomanSpa (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.