Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Original Hits

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WITHDRAWN by nominator. Dennis Brown |  | WER 21:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original Hits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relatively unknown collection, featuring material released by a former record label. no significant except the track listing and it's release → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 23:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:MUSICBIO#C2 - read this. I am tempted to expand this article to DYK level.--Launchballer 00:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Question in what ways does it meet (or not meet) WP:NALBUMS criteria? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Signature? I find WP:NALBUMS very vague, I tend to apply the WP:NSONGS criteria to albums.--Launchballer 00:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer you can't just ignore WP:NALBUMS because you find it vague. One review (from Allmusic) and information about release dates but no charts doesn't make an album notable. Even music notability criteria aside it doesn't and won't pass WP:GNG → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 19:47, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The album has charted, on three regional charts and in the Bubbling Under Hot 100.--Launchballer 20:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops! can someone speedy close this then as a keep? → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 20:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.