Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pool Party (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pool Party (video game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable shovelware title for the Wii. Not enough good sources, borderline WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Cue sports. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Per WP:NEXIST. 13 reviews in Metacritic based on a 2 second search, numerous ones are from major gaming sites. There are absolutely enough good sources to form an article should someone wish to do so - notability is impossible to seriously debate. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Looks like the refs in the article make a decent effort at proving notability, but the additional ones on metacritic help prove this Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per sources found by Zxcvbnm.Timur9008 (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everyone else. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 02:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.